Yeah, but the big issue here is that even if VP is collecting existing technologies, they inevitably overlap with the products that Apple is already so good at. There is no market segment left because Apple, over the course of decades, has made the personal computer (and the cell phone) a collection of most essential technologies.Heard it before. Even the first Mac was a collection of existing technologies but the way of putting them together changed everything. Apple has always used existing technologies but improved and declined better.
VP is being called the new iPad, but how much discourse have we already seen with Silicon Chip iPads about how the iPad overlaps with the capabilities of a Mac? Tablets are awesome, but they have long been the bastard children of the product lineup, especially when it comes to growth. They really only ended up distracting Apple from tending to its Mac products for most of the 2010s.
Sounds silly, but Mac and iPhone's most base level use cases were the 'need to file' and the 'need to communicate'. Personal computers and cell phones are device containers we've always shown little friction to, so they can collect all the technologies needed. Watches are too, but even those are just there to be glanced at, at most.
Vision Pro, by definition, can't collect existing technologies with enough steam because headsets aren't a container we're used to as a society, and might not be anytime remotely soon. It seems to already show those signs of limited growth.
Last edited: