Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,816
31,322


Apple used to regularly increase the base memory of its Macs up until 2011, the same year Tim Cook was appointed CEO, charts posted on Mastodon by David Schaub show.

macos-sonoma-feature-purple-green.jpg

Earlier this year, Schaub generated two charts: One showing the base memory capacities of Apple's all-in-one Macs from 1984 onwards, and a second depicting Apple's consumer laptop base RAM from 1999 onwards. Both charts were recently resurfaced by the Accidental Tech Podcast.

The graphs show that Apple tended to increase the base memory every two years or so, but that this trend ended when Cook took over the company from Steve Jobs. Memory increased quickly until the Mac Plus was launched in 1986, notes Schaub. "1986 to 1990 were all about decreasing the entry Mac price," he says. "Then we get a pretty straight logarithmic line until Tim Cook became CEO and there has only been a single increase since."

all-in-one-base-ram-chart.jpg

The correlation is interesting, but other variables such as market trends and changes in technology can help to account for the plateau in Cook's era. For example, Stuart McHattie notes that early all-in-one Macs saw a tenfold increase every six years. If that trend had continued from 2006 onwards when the base was 500MB, modern base model Macs would have reached 500GB. Yet today's consumer PC demand for RAM remains around 8GB to 64GB, and very rarely exceeds double digits.

Computers have also changed a lot over the last several years. RAM has gotten faster. Hard disk drives have been superseded by solid-state storage. Chips and components are more tightly integrated. Apple no longer relies on Intel processors to power its machines, and instead uses high performance system-on-a-chip (SOC) architecture, which fuses CPUs, GPUs, and unified memory into a single package. This is why the company feels confident in arguing that 8GB on a Mac is comparable to 16GB on rival systems.

laptop-base-ram-chart.jpg

But that does not change the fact that Apple has offered iMac and MacBook Pro models with 8GB of RAM since 2012. Likewise, the MacBook Air has had the same base memory configuration since 2017. In addition, Apple's adoption of unified memory means that Macs cannot have their RAM upgraded after purchase, while Apple continues to pursue a strategy of vastly overcharging customers for higher memory configurations. Users often pay out $200 or more at checkout just to future proof their machines.
Apple's Mac memory configuration strategy is likely to become even more contentious if all upcoming iPhone 16 models turn out to include 8GB of RAM. (In the iPhone 15 series, only the Pro models have 8GB, whereas standard models have 6GB.) Why Apple is prepared to increase RAM in a smartphone but not in a multitasking Mac without users paying excessively for the privilege will be the overriding question on many consumers' lips.

Article Link: Apple's Regular Mac Base RAM Boosts Ended When Tim Cook Took Over
 

truthsteve

macrumors 6502a
Nov 3, 2023
864
2,586
or...you know... a more sensible reason: plenty of consumers became fine with the base ram

and the fact that unified memory costs more than standard memory to implement

and you know...combatting sky rocketing prices...

and flash storage became fast enough for swap....

and so on..

but go ahead, write confirmation bias so that we can feel good about hating on Tim Cook, mr David Schaub
 
Last edited:

Abazigal

Contributor
Jul 18, 2011
19,694
22,254
Singapore
Yet another proof (as if that wasn't enough) of Apple's greed.

Apple just remember that "you reap what you sow".
What do you think Apple has been experiencing for the past 2 decades? They are reaping the benefits of having an integrated ecosystem because they were the only company willing to invest in having an ecosystem in the first place.

So yeah, I for one certainly hope that Apple continues to reap these benefits for a good long time to come. :cool:
 

ItsASpider

macrumors regular
Apr 20, 2021
115
724
What dishonest graphs. Why is the X-Axis logarithmic? 🤦🏻‍♂️
Could it be because the RAM capacity increase over time is also logarithmic until it completely stops? This is a basic example of where you'd use a logarithmic scale. If you'd use a normal scale the line would basically be flat and then shoot straight up in 2011, then continue flat again.

---

There is no denying that continuing the growth rate as it was prior to 2011 would have been nonsensical... However, it completely grinding to a halt is equally stupid, especially for the prices Apple charges. The 8GB options do not exist to be actually usable, they're just there for the marketing. Most high-end phones have long ago surpassed Apple's baseline RAM capacity, which is genuinely ridiculous (on both sides, to be entirely honest) and now that even the iPhone is catching up to it, it really is time for Apple to scratch themselves behind the ears here. Most of its competitors no longer offer 8 GB variants of their high-end devices anymore either (and hell, they usually have separate VRAM too). 8GB is just not acceptable anymore.
 

maramok

macrumors member
Mar 30, 2015
34
158
New Jersey
correlation is not causation.
i think this has a lot more to do with average need for ram plateauing. How much ram does my iphone have? and honestly at this point how much is in my computer? I honestly don't know offhand and would need to look it up, this is because it doesn't matter, they have enough for me to not care about it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.