Can't stand TikTok but Timmy isn't going to treat this like he does any other app. It's China. He's in bed with them.
Apple applies its rules equally, without fear or favor.
Can't stand TikTok but Timmy isn't going to treat this like he does any other app. It's China. He's in bed with them.
If there was ever a reason not to allow this, it is TikTok. I say 'sucked in to the EU'. Forget malware. Try TikTokall these **** apps pulling things like this. and EU has apple opening up their devices to any and all apps? too bad apple doesn't have just an iPod line up. all this clutter and trash ass stuff being ported over is just going to make it even more dodgy. it would be nice if they enforced the same requires on previous iterations of App Store to the Mac
Not going to happen. It makes too much money. They'll just comply.Soon it will be tic-toc-tic-toc-tic-toc…banned
TikTok doesn't actually make money. Despite its popularity, it somehow manages to lose money.Not going to happen. It makes too much money. They'll just comply.
Remember the TikTok issue has _nothing_ to do with China and everything to do with its competition (facebook, etc) trying to take them down. Not to mention the government doesn't like that they cant strong arm them into election interference like they can with their competition. It's really despicable. I would rather use TikTok any day over Facebook.
Apple does not handle TikTok chargebacks in any way or in any monetization aspect. But you knew that.It's always the apps that would probably benefit from Apple handling the chargebacks their monetization models invite...
“Lossmaking”TikTok doesn't actually make money. Despite its popularity, it somehow manages to lose money.
ByteDance posts record profit despite TikTok losses
Booming 2022 helps it overtake China’s long-reigning tech giants Tencent and Alibaba for first timewww.ft.com
ByteDance raked in a record underlying profit last year, overtaking China’s long-reigning tech giants Tencent and Alibaba for the first time even as losses mounted for its fast-growing TikTok business unit.
[ . . . ]
Any forced sale or ban of TikTok would hit ByteDance’s potential earnings. Although it generated about 80 per cent of its revenues in China last year and TikTok was lossmaking, it nonetheless represents an important future profit engine.
A ByteDance investor in the US said a TikTok ban would not gut the company’s financials based on current earnings. “TikTok is not as material a percentage of ByteDance’s total revenue as people assume. But the ban would be a real loss to future potential given its growth rate,” the investor said.
I agree with you though. TikTok will not be sold. China has said so many times.
Except they don't. There have been a few times that they either bent the rules or looked the other way for big apps.Apple applies its rules equally, without fear or favor.
Except they don't. There have been a few times that they either bent the rules or looked the other way for big apps.
They still have 16B in revenue. A loss isn't necessarily a bad thing. It means you're not paying any taxes for one.TikTok doesn't actually make money. Despite its popularity, it somehow manages to lose money.
ByteDance posts record profit despite TikTok losses
Booming 2022 helps it overtake China’s long-reigning tech giants Tencent and Alibaba for first timewww.ft.com
ByteDance raked in a record underlying profit last year, overtaking China’s long-reigning tech giants Tencent and Alibaba for the first time even as losses mounted for its fast-growing TikTok business unit.
[ . . . ]
Any forced sale or ban of TikTok would hit ByteDance’s potential earnings. Although it generated about 80 per cent of its revenues in China last year and TikTok was lossmaking, it nonetheless represents an important future profit engine.
A ByteDance investor in the US said a TikTok ban would not gut the company’s financials based on current earnings. “TikTok is not as material a percentage of ByteDance’s total revenue as people assume. But the ban would be a real loss to future potential given its growth rate,” the investor said.
I agree with you though. TikTok will not be sold. China has said so many times.
HAHAHA. I mean, come on.AFAIK - that's only speculative gossip from people with an anti-Apple agenda. I truly believe Apple treats every developer the same with equal opportunities to build robust businesses alongside Apple technology products and services.
They don't bend on the 30% cut, but they absolutely bend on the application of the App Store guidelines. And it's not "anti-Apple speculation". It's been confirmed in court documents.AFAIK - that's only speculative gossip from people with an anti-Apple agenda. I truly believe Apple treats every developer the same with equal opportunities to build robust businesses alongside Apple technology products and services.
They don't bend on the 30% cut, but they absolutely bend on the application of the App Store guidelines. And it's not "anti-Apple speculation". It's been confirmed in court documents.
Here in Ontario it’s illegal to take any portion of tips. The service industry got that one passed a few years ago. I wonder if Apple would be in violation of the law here.
While TikTok should be banned, Apple, for all purposes, effectively steals from customers every time it price-gouges them for increasing the RAM of their devices to usable and sustainable levels.They are literally stealing from Apple.
Ban them.
Why would TikTok need to be profitable when its sole purpose is to spy on and manipulate Americans... or so I've been told.“Lossmaking”
Hardly.
But if people are purchasing things on the web how is that contractually owed? It’s not like TikTok is setting up it’s own payment system in-app.If you agree to a contract and then not paying the money you are contractually owed, that could be considered stealing. Netflix isn't stealing because what they are doing is still within their right according to the rules of the contract. These coin shenanigans aren't.
Apple could have a scale where larger developers pay more than smaller ones. As it is now many of the big name developers don’t pay Apple anything (outside of the annual developer fee).The intent here is not to disincentivise small developers from releasing apps from the App Store.
Contrary to what many might believe here, what contributes to the vitality and vibrancy of the App Store aren't the big-name apps like Facebook, YouTube, Netflix or Spotify. Rather, it's the indie developers, and many of them are releasing apps that make no money (because they are free). Which in turns means that they don't pay Apple a cent either.
$99 a year is enough of a barrier to discourage any random Tom or Harry from simply signing up for one for the fun of it (or perhaps to get access to the latest developer betas ahead of time), while still not over penalising developers who may still be students themselves with no steady source of income.
Apple is not a very hard company to read.
It's just US, which is a small part of the world.Maybe. They only have 9 months left to go. Sell or being banned.
It's not going to happen anyway, first amendment, bill of attainder, take your pick on why it's unconstitutional to ban TikTok, but it is.It's just US, which is a small part of the world.