Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

44267547

Cancelled
Jul 12, 2016
37,642
42,492
Our regional airport is rumored to implement a ‘vaccine visa’, in other words, if you want to fly domestically from our location, you would have to have some validation of a vaccination record. Now, of course that’s not been verified, but it wouldn’t surprise me if this is exactly what it’s coming to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fourthtunz

ThomasJL

macrumors 68000
Oct 16, 2008
1,626
3,589
Soon, we’ll need a Covid passport just to walk into the grocery store or even our place of work. Is this how they start to condition us for what’s to come?
I hope so. That would be wonderful. It would help protect the elderly and those with underlying conditions from death. Furthermore, it would send a message to selfish jerks that their selfish jerk behavior will not be tolerated.
 

qoop

macrumors 6502
Feb 4, 2021
440
424
THE UNITED KINGDOM
Whos taking away your freedom? It's a private company... don't like their rules? Oh well.... fly with someone else.
Won't let me fly? Ok, let down their tyres. I'm a private citizen and can do what I like — is that how it works?

(DO NOT TRY THIS)
 
Last edited:

phalseHUD

macrumors 6502
Mar 7, 2011
280
356
Digital Sprawl
The flu is different, because, generally speaking, when you are contagious with the flu, you know it. If you knowingly get on a flight while having flu symptoms, and someone dies because of it, you’ll pay a price.

What do you mean you’ll pay a price? How would someone with flu know that they killed someone inadvertently? Perhaps I’ve misunderstood you or you’re confused here?

With CV19 you can be contagious and not even know you’ve been infected.

And if you have a negative test for Covid, assuming it’s a high quality test and is recent enough, that’s fine. That’s why all of these “passport” schemes also allow for testing out.

Life has a 100% mortality rate, but I wasn’t supposed to die today because some selfish ******* has to fly to see his sister-wife and won’t get a vaccine because ‘MURICA!

That part. 100%

Even so, with Flu you can be contagious and not even know you’re infected. The CDC states the following about Flu here:


I’ve highlighted in bold and italics, the important parts for you both below.

“When Flu Spreads​

People with flu are most contagious in the first three to four days after their illness begins. Most healthy adults may be able to infect others beginning 1 day before symptoms develop and up to 5 to 7 days after becoming sick. Children and some people with weakened immune systems may pass the virus for longer than 7 days.

Symptoms can begin about 2 days (but can range from 1 to 4 days) after the virus enters the body. That means that you may be able to pass on the flu to someone else before you know you are sick, as well as while you are sick. Some people can be infected with the flu virus but have no symptoms. During this time, those people may still spread the virus to others.

Period of Contagiousness​

You may be able to pass on flu to someone else before you know you are sick, as well as while you are sick.

  • People with flu are most contagious in the first 3-4 days after their illness begins.
  • Some otherwise healthy adults may be able to infect others beginning 1 day before symptoms develop and up to 5 to 7 days after becoming sick.
  • Some people, especially young children and people with weakened immune systems, might be able to infect others with flu viruses for an even longer time.”

So actually no, you’re wrong. Someone could pass on flu inadvertently BEFORE they even know they are sick with flu...
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: CJ Dorschel

qoop

macrumors 6502
Feb 4, 2021
440
424
THE UNITED KINGDOM
What do you mean you’ll pay a price? How would someone with flu know that they killed someone inadvertently? Perhaps I’ve misunderstood you or you’re confused here?





Even so, with Flu you can be contagious and not even know you’re infected. The CDC states the following about Flu here:


I’ve highlighted in bold and italics, the important parts for you both below.

“When Flu Spreads​

People with flu are most contagious in the first three to four days after their illness begins. Most healthy adults may be able to infect others beginning 1 day before symptoms develop and up to 5 to 7 days after becoming sick. Children and some people with weakened immune systems may pass the virus for longer than 7 days.

Symptoms can begin about 2 days (but can range from 1 to 4 days) after the virus enters the body. That means that you may be able to pass on the flu to someone else before you know you are sick, as well as while you are sick. Some people can be infected with the flu virus but have no symptoms. During this time, those people may still spread the virus to others.

Period of Contagiousness​

You may be able to pass on flu to someone else before you know you are sick, as well as while you are sick.

  • People with flu are most contagious in the first 3-4 days after their illness begins.
  • Some otherwise healthy adults may be able to infect others beginning 1 day before symptoms develop and up to 5 to 7 days after becoming sick.
  • Some people, especially young children and people with weakened immune systems, might be able to infect others with flu viruses for an even longer time.”

So actually no, you’re wrong. Someone could pass on flu inadvertently BEFORE they even know they are sick with flu...

You're right. We were contagious for 14 days before symptoms showed in late December 2019.
 

Td1970

Suspended
Jan 29, 2021
512
472
I bet they would be heart broken to lose your business....

I really don’t care if they mind or not. But I can shop where I wish. You do realize that I’ve been vaccinated and wear my mask. I WONT show papers to shop.
 

tivoboy

macrumors 68040
May 15, 2005
3,998
803
Actually no it is not. Statistics are alluding to the possibility. But there have been no examinations of actual biological mechanisms for produced antibodies absolutely preventing any sort of infection.

were this the case it would have been stated by the manufactures to begin with. All they’ve ever been willing to claim is it reduces the severity and intensity of the illness and may prevent infection in some individuals.

the only study to date that alludes to the possibility of infection risk being so low that it’s barely a consideration is that of the CDC which followed individuals who are healthcare and essential workers. Those real-life examples are of people who already take tremendous precautions not to get or transmit the virus.

and there were still infections reported among the population.

it’s also not entirely clear how the control was established or if it was in any way representative of an equivalent scenario.
Actually it is.. I’m not referring at all to the RECENT CDC survey and study of 4000+ medical workers, but to the actual israeli and norwegeian studies of actual overall viral load reduction even for vaccinated populations who had been infected regardless and their nasal and oral exhaust of viral particles. Now, one could possibly argue with the science and general applicability of two highly homogenous populations and the lack of new mutations at the time affecting these data from late Dec through March, but it is certainly 100% true that it is not 100% false that vaccinations reduce transmissibility from a biological standpoint at some level more than 0% - which was what my comment was meant to indicate.
 
Last edited:

CJ Dorschel

Cancelled
Dec 14, 2019
407
808
Berlin
What do you mean you’ll pay a price? How would someone with flu know that they killed someone inadvertently? Perhaps I’ve misunderstood you or you’re confused here?





Even so, with Flu you can be contagious and not even know you’re infected. The CDC states the following about Flu here:


I’ve highlighted in bold and italics, the important parts for you both below.

“When Flu Spreads​

People with flu are most contagious in the first three to four days after their illness begins. Most healthy adults may be able to infect others beginning 1 day before symptoms develop and up to 5 to 7 days after becoming sick. Children and some people with weakened immune systems may pass the virus for longer than 7 days.

Symptoms can begin about 2 days (but can range from 1 to 4 days) after the virus enters the body. That means that you may be able to pass on the flu to someone else before you know you are sick, as well as while you are sick. Some people can be infected with the flu virus but have no symptoms. During this time, those people may still spread the virus to others.

Period of Contagiousness​

You may be able to pass on flu to someone else before you know you are sick, as well as while you are sick.

  • People with flu are most contagious in the first 3-4 days after their illness begins.
  • Some otherwise healthy adults may be able to infect others beginning 1 day before symptoms develop and up to 5 to 7 days after becoming sick.
  • Some people, especially young children and people with weakened immune systems, might be able to infect others with flu viruses for an even longer time.”

So actually no, you’re wrong. Someone could pass on flu inadvertently BEFORE they even know they are sick with flu...
I honestly don’t know what you’re getting at as COVID-19 is not the flu thus you are comparing apples to oranges.

I also worked on a COVID-19 task force in the tri-state area so please don’t tell me (or anyone) what I am right or wrong about especially when you’re way off.

SARS-CoV-2 uses a coronavirus as its primary transmission method but it is not the flu. Anytime anyone mentions the flu as a comparison to downplay SARS-CoV-2 - it‘s a game and I’m not a reindeer.

On that note we’ve had a massive global decline in the flu this past season. I wonder why…
 

phalseHUD

macrumors 6502
Mar 7, 2011
280
356
Digital Sprawl
I honestly don’t know what you’re getting at as COVID-19 is not the flu thus you are comparing apples to oranges.

I didn’t compare COVID-19 to Flu though... I’ve included my previous post below, which you might have missed.

I also worked on a COVID-19 task force in the tri-state area so please don’t tell me (or anyone) what I am right or wrong about especially when you’re way off.

SARS-CoV-2 uses a coronavirus as its primary transmission method but it is not the flu. Anytime anyone mentions the flu as a comparison to downplay SARS-CoV-2 - it‘s a game and I’m not a reindeer.

On that note we’ve had a massive global decline in the flu this past season. I wonder why…

That sounds totally conceited! You’re THE authority on Covid and cannot be challenged? I’m not allowed to tell you, or anyone, if I think you/they are wrong? Unbelievable!

Anyway, back to my post:

All this for a virus with an IFR of 0.23%... ??‍♂️ Jesus, flying is risky, even getting vaccinated is risky. I’m not saying the risk is the same but everything has some degree of risk. Would you be happy with someone sitting next to you on a plane who is unvaccinated, but tested negative for SARS-CoV-2?

What happens if you sit next to someone who has Flu but isn’t displaying symptoms yet, then you die from the resulting pneumonia? Should we all be subjected to compulsory vaccinations for seasonal flu too?

Life has a 100% mortality rate.

As you can see, I put forward a hypothetical scenario to cmaier, which he seemed to dismiss with his reply “generally speaking, when you are contagious with the flu, you know it.”

This is not true. The CDC state “most people with flu are contagious for about 1 day BEFORE they show symptoms.”

Do you care to answer the hypothetical question?

EDIT: removed the speechless emoji and added some exclamation marks. After sleeping on it, I thought my reply required them.
 
Last edited:

Caliber26

macrumors 68020
Sep 25, 2009
2,325
3,637
Orlando, FL
I hope so. That would be wonderful. It would help protect the elderly and those with underlying conditions from death. Furthermore, it would send a message to selfish jerks that their selfish jerk behavior will not be tolerated.
Thomas, you are LITERALLY THE LEAST QUALIFIED person to speak about this. Stop. While you’re still ahead, just… stop.
 

code-m

macrumors 68040
Apr 13, 2006
3,638
3,399
Soon, we’ll need a Covid passport just to walk into the grocery store or even our place of work. Is this how they start to condition us for what’s to come?
It may eventually lead to social credits and then when these people who are cheering it on gets personally affected there will be no going back.

The way this works is to promote some benefit to take the vaccines, once people are permitted to travel, go to the theatres, social gatherings and most fall for it then comes the restrictive behaviours. Who one is talking to, what one is thinking or planning and then restrict movement and payment methods.

Its dystopian and we have people willingly complying, similar to the opioid crisis, smoking, Monsanto, etc. Government, Big Pharma, paid actors which include doctors can all be trusted. /s
 
  • Like
Reactions: Caliber26

siddavis

macrumors 6502a
Feb 23, 2009
864
2,908
Then you can choose not to fly with that company. They have the right to set forth any rule they wish..... Don't like it? Oh well.
Agree. The discussion is if this is a good idea. People can still think it is not a good idea and the private companies can choose to employ it. Now, go bake the cake I want.
 

jw2002

macrumors 6502
Feb 23, 2008
392
59
Covid passports will be good for business and capitalism overall. They will reduce the need for onerous testing and quarantine especially in the case of travel. Consumer confidence will be higher for places that incorporate a covid passport because of the implied safety improvement. No one is being forced to get a covid passport. If a business changes its terms and conditions to require a covid passport, then that is entirely up to them in a free market system. If an individual disagrees with that business, then I 100% support their right to seek out some other business. Realistically, such folks may find their options to be extremely limited, but hey that was their choice, and they know what they need to do to rejoin mainstream society.
 
  • Like
Reactions: iGeneo

Caliber26

macrumors 68020
Sep 25, 2009
2,325
3,637
Orlando, FL
It may eventually lead to social credits and then when these people who are cheering it on gets personally affected there will be no going back.

The way this works is to promote some benefit to take the vaccines, once people are permitted to travel, go to the theatres, social gatherings and most fall for it then comes the restrictive behaviours. Who one is talking to, what one is thinking or planning and then restrict movement and payment methods.

Its dystopian and we have people willingly complying, similar to the opioid crisis, smoking, Monsanto, etc. Government, Big Pharma, paid actors which include doctors can all be trusted. /s
As someone who is of Christian faith and believes everything written in the Bible, seeing what’s happening right now is terrifying. What once felt like a very a distant age of tribulation seems to be closing in on us in a way I never thought I’d live long enough to see. Time to gird our loins.
 

phalseHUD

macrumors 6502
Mar 7, 2011
280
356
Digital Sprawl
Covid passports will be good for business and capitalism overall. They will reduce the need for onerous testing and quarantine especially in the case of travel. Consumer confidence will be higher for places that incorporate a covid passport because of the implied safety improvement. No one is being forced to get a covid passport. If a business changes its terms and conditions to require a covid passport, then that is entirely up to them in a free market system. If an individual disagrees with that business, then I 100% support their right to seek out some other business. Realistically, such folks may find their options to be extremely limited, but hey that was their choice, and they know what they need to do to rejoin mainstream society.

??‍♂️ It’s remarkable how some people are so completely ignorant of FACTS. All this for a virus with a 0.23% IFR - if not lower. We seem to have lost ALL sense of perspective...

I often wonder what the men who fought in both world wars - as well as the other wars of the 20th century - must think of the men in society today. They fought for our freedom from tyranny and dictatorship whilst living under horrendous circumstances. The constant threat of death, bullets whizzing past their heads all around, seeing death and destruction at every turn. They watched their pals die right in front of them in horrific circumstances, sustained life changing injuries both physically and mentally, and then uncovered the horrors they found at Nazi concentration camps (and also Japanese concentration camps), where people had been murdered, experimented on, worked to death or left for dead.

I’d love to know what they’d think of this current situation and the men in society today.
 

fourthtunz

macrumors 68000
Jul 23, 2002
1,734
1,210
Maine
??‍♂️ It’s remarkable how some people are so completely ignorant of FACTS. All this for a virus with a 0.23% IFR - if not lower. We seem to have lost ALL sense of perspective...

I often wonder what the men who fought in both world wars - as well as the other wars of the 20th century - must think of the men in society today. They fought for our freedom from tyranny and dictatorship whilst living under horrendous circumstances. The constant threat of death, bullets whizzing past their heads all around, seeing death and destruction at every turn. They watched their pals die right in front of them in horrific circumstances, sustained life changing injuries both physically and mentally, and then uncovered the horrors they found at Nazi concentration camps (and also Japanese concentration camps), where people had been murdered, experimented on, worked to death or left for dead.

I’d love to know what they’d think of this current situation and the men in society today.
You're quoting the lowest IFR that i've seen but that's fine.
So what does that mean? We shouldn't wear masks or want to get the vaccine?
I'm more worried about passing it on to my mother or people that I take care of.
There are the stories of people that are athletes catching covid and not coming back
as they were, that scares me more than dying.
But you ask some good questions.
 

phalseHUD

macrumors 6502
Mar 7, 2011
280
356
Digital Sprawl
You're quoting the lowest IFR that i've seen but that's fine.

It’s a peer reviewed study and you can find it here. Listened to a really interesting podcast with John P A Ioannidis here too. He states the IFR rate of 0.23% in his peer reviewed paper, is actually likely to be even lower and he gives his reasons in the podcast. Just can’t understand why his paper hasn’t received the airtime on either TV or Radio.

So what does that mean? We shouldn't wear masks or want to get the vaccine?
I'm more worried about passing it on to my mother or people that I take care of.
There are the stories of people that are athletes catching covid and not coming back
as they were, that scares me more than dying.

It’s a tricky one and there’s lots to it... I think everyone will/should naturally want to keep each other safe as best they can, especially their loved ones. My personal take on this is pretty simple. If you deem your chances against the virus to be poor, getting vaccinated is probably wise, wear your masks and keep your distance etc. Maybe even stay in until you’ve been vaccinated! Certainly if you’re over life expectancy age, the vaccine is probably a good thing.

In the UK here, up till about the start of March 2021 we had 524 deaths in people aged 15-44 (my age bracket). Those unfortunate people who died are likely to have had underlying health problems.

According to the government’s own statistics, there have been a similar number of deaths from people having both the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines too. Now it’s not clear what age groups those unfortunate people fell under, but again I’m assuming they were likely to have had underlying health problems. You really have to look for this information though... Here are the links for the Pfizer Print Analysis and the AstraZeneca Print Analysis. But, you can’t find that information anywhere on the NHS (National Health Service) website! That I find extremely odd.

Anyway, based on numbers alone, a healthy person in the 15-44 age bracket pretty much has nothing to worry about from the virus as you can see in the UK Gov Greenbook I linked.

I think closing up business and taking away people’s means of earning a living, is an extreme measure. I’m not saying this should never be considered for any disease, but I’m not sure it should have been enforced for something that the UK Government no longer considered to be a High Consequence Infectious Disease back on 19th March 2020. Yes March 2020! As you can see here. Again that’s not to undermine the loss people have suffered on the back of Covid-19, there have been around 130,000 that have died ‘with’ Covid. But again, there in lies another problem... Dying with or of.

Conscious I’ve gone on a bit here but, regarding your last point about athletes. I’ll be honest, I don’t know of any who have had a lasting dose of Covid. I think I may have heard about an MMA fighter recently but I can’t remember who. Did you ever hear of a footballer called Fabrice Muamba? He suffered a cardiac arrest on the pitch a good few years back now. He survived thankfully. There was also Marty Fish who played tennis and a Welsh Olympic Rower whose name escapes me, who both suffered from Atrial Fibrillation. Yep it’s scary to think that people in their prime can come down with illness, but it happens. I agree, the thought of being changed is really scary. There is a lady on Good Morning Britain whose husband has been in hospital with Covid since last March or April! Think the best thing we can do is look at the numbers, seek out the data and keep perspective.


But you ask some good questions.

Thanks mate, appreciate that! Nice to speak with someone in a cordial manner!
 

ThomasJL

macrumors 68000
Oct 16, 2008
1,626
3,589
??‍♂️ It’s remarkable how some people are so completely ignorant of FACTS. All this for a virus with a 0.23% IFR - if not lower. We seem to have lost ALL sense of perspective...

I often wonder what the men who fought in both world wars - as well as the other wars of the 20th century - must think of the men in society today. They fought for our freedom from tyranny and dictatorship whilst living under horrendous circumstances. The constant threat of death, bullets whizzing past their heads all around, seeing death and destruction at every turn. They watched their pals die right in front of them in horrific circumstances, sustained life changing injuries both physically and mentally, and then uncovered the horrors they found at Nazi concentration camps (and also Japanese concentration camps), where people had been murdered, experimented on, worked to death or left for dead.

I’d love to know what they’d think of this current situation and the men in society today.
I’d love to know what those World War II veterans would think of the people today who won’t do something as extremely easy as wearing a face mask to protect the lives of elderly people such as World War II veterans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fourthtunz

phalseHUD

macrumors 6502
Mar 7, 2011
280
356
Digital Sprawl
I’d love to know what those World War II veterans would think of the people today who won’t do something as extremely easy as wearing a face mask to protect the lives of elderly people such as World War II veterans.


I’m not saying there aren’t selfish idiots around... But we do need to be mindful that there are people who genuinely can’t wear a mask.

I’m know someone who looks after a young adult with autism and has sensory issues, for example. Then I’ve read about veterans with PTSD who are crippled by severe anxiety at the mere thought of having to wear one. I also remember listening to an interview with a woman who was gagged and raped and obviously has issues with having her face covered, but also seeing other people with masks on too...

Is it right that a woman who has been raped needs to explain to some security guard at the shop front, why she cannot wear a mask? Is it right that she has to wear some kind of marker/lanyard showing she has a private reason (and therefore reminder) for not wearing a mask? Or should she just stay at home and order everything online?

Life is complicated.
 

fourthtunz

macrumors 68000
Jul 23, 2002
1,734
1,210
Maine
It’s a peer reviewed study and you can find it here. Listened to a really interesting podcast with John P A Ioannidis here too. He states the IFR rate of 0.23% in his peer reviewed paper, is actually likely to be even lower and he gives his reasons in the podcast. Just can’t understand why his paper hasn’t received the airtime on either TV or Radio.



It’s a tricky one and there’s lots to it... I think everyone will/should naturally want to keep each other safe as best they can, especially their loved ones. My personal take on this is pretty simple. If you deem your chances against the virus to be poor, getting vaccinated is probably wise, wear your masks and keep your distance etc. Maybe even stay in until you’ve been vaccinated! Certainly if you’re over life expectancy age, the vaccine is probably a good thing.

In the UK here, up till about the start of March 2021 we had 524 deaths in people aged 15-44 (my age bracket). Those unfortunate people who died are likely to have had underlying health problems.

According to the government’s own statistics, there have been a similar number of deaths from people having both the Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines too. Now it’s not clear what age groups those unfortunate people fell under, but again I’m assuming they were likely to have had underlying health problems. You really have to look for this information though... Here are the links for the Pfizer Print Analysis and the AstraZeneca Print Analysis. But, you can’t find that information anywhere on the NHS (National Health Service) website! That I find extremely odd.

Anyway, based on numbers alone, a healthy person in the 15-44 age bracket pretty much has nothing to worry about from the virus as you can see in the UK Gov Greenbook I linked.

I think closing up business and taking away people’s means of earning a living, is an extreme measure. I’m not saying this should never be considered for any disease, but I’m not sure it should have been enforced for something that the UK Government no longer considered to be a High Consequence Infectious Disease back on 19th March 2020. Yes March 2020! As you can see here. Again that’s not to undermine the loss people have suffered on the back of Covid-19, there have been around 130,000 that have died ‘with’ Covid. But again, there in lies another problem... Dying with or of.

Conscious I’ve gone on a bit here but, regarding your last point about athletes. I’ll be honest, I don’t know of any who have had a lasting dose of Covid. I think I may have heard about an MMA fighter recently but I can’t remember who. Did you ever hear of a footballer called Fabrice Muamba? He suffered a cardiac arrest on the pitch a good few years back now. He survived thankfully. There was also Marty Fish who played tennis and a Welsh Olympic Rower whose name escapes me, who both suffered from Atrial Fibrillation. Yep it’s scary to think that people in their prime can come down with illness, but it happens. I agree, the thought of being changed is really scary. There is a lady on Good Morning Britain whose husband has been in hospital with Covid since last March or April! Think the best thing we can do is look at the numbers, seek out the data and keep perspective.




Thanks mate, appreciate that! Nice to speak with someone in a cordial manner!
No problem! I'm 58 so I'm in a different age group but am very healthy.
I'm in the US and mask wearing has become a divisive political matter.
Many people aren't wearing masks because of political beliefs or believe because they
are young and healthy and can't get it, doesn't mean they can't spread it.

"Anyway, based on numbers alone, a healthy person in the 15-44 age bracket pretty much has nothing to worry about from the virus as you can see in the UK Gov Greenbook I linked."

This group is responsible for the spread here in the US.

You in the UK have done a better job of slowing the spread.
Anyhow wearing a mask is easy and helps slow the spread.
The vaccination will help as more people get it.
Right now the US is on upswing with cases and deaths are down but
unfortunately those will rise again and those cases make it to the hospital.
The IFR is over 1% here in the US and may be higher due to under reporting
of deaths. In any event with mask wearing, distancing and vaccinations
death or injury from covid is less likely.
Stay safe!
 
Last edited:

0924487

Cancelled
Aug 17, 2016
2,699
2,808
This is a very bad idea for many reasons.

1. The vaccine is not available in the free market. It is only available through the government to populations that the government has designated as favored recipients.
If governments restrict travel to those who have the vaccine while simultaneously controlling who gets the vaccine, they have built an effective tool for awarding travel to only the people groups that they favor.

2. If this catches on, the COVID-19 vaccine will not remain the only requirement for this passport. What about the rest of the possible vaccines? Shouldn’t those be required? And even if you have all your vaccines, maybe we should require a recent health check from a government-certified doctor. And how do we address mental health to ensure complete safety? Perhaps everyone should have to meet with a government psychologist to ensure that their ideas are safe to travel.

- - -

This idea gives the government the means to choose which groups they favor for participation in travel commerce based on whatever arbitrary set of metrics they can make sound half-reasonable. It is a huge amount of freedom to cede to the government and it will certainly be abused by bad faith government types around the world.
Government cannot make something a requirement if it’s not yet available for all. Just like COVID PCR tests are waived if a traveller is from a region or country where this is credibly unavailable.

If you are well travelled around the world you probably already know that you need some kind of vaccine passports to get in and out of certain region already.

If you want to get a study permit to a different country, you need a full general physical (full-on medical exam with all lab tests and radiology). You need to pretty much tick all the boxes or else you are not going anywhere.

In many countries, especially in East Asia, a general physical is required for every job application. You don’t need to tick all the boxes but if you have major issues like a heart condition or things like HIV, you are done.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.