It would be nice if they let the T-Mobile CEO sit in on this meeting so that maybe he can learn a thing or two.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple CEO Tim Cook to Meet With U.S. President Joe Biden to Discuss Cybersecurity
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Why am I thinking it'll go something like this....
"So you mean its a phone that doesn't need wires? C'mon. What kind of sprinkles do you want?"
"So you mean its a phone that doesn't need wires? C'mon. What kind of sprinkles do you want?"
honestly sometimes your comments are just a whole bunch of mixed viewpoints, posted first...Just FOCUS on STOPPING CSAM, Tim. I hope the other CEO's that will be joining the meeting is not happy with what Apple is about to introduce with CSAM.
Hopefully, Tim doesn't focus on Cyber Espionage. LOL, is this a joke?
Apple CEO Tim Cook wants tough data privacy laws in the US like Europe - Cybersecurity Insiders
Apple CEO Tim Cook shared his insights at the International Conference on Data Privacy recently and advocated for tough data privacy laws in the US likewww.cybersecurity-insiders.com
Corporations have always complied and cooperated with the authorities. Echelon, Prism, Xkeyscore, what have you not… Apple is certainly no exception, and the feds got their hands in their clouds.
If this was China, and Ma Huateng met with president Xi Jinping under similar circumstances, the tune would be a bit different.
If this was China, and Ma Huateng met with president Xi Jinping under similar circumstances, the tune would be a bit different.
Taking advantage of the demented elderly is wrong…
…even if it’s Tim Cook doing it.
…even if it’s Tim Cook doing it.
You can remove the content label from your post since it's irrelevant to the discussion. Apple is scanning all your content and then sharing information about every photo with third parties. Why and how don't really mean much.
Hey, I’m a Freemason, and I don’t want to sound threatening but…
Watch yourself.
We know everything about you.
Depends on how you encrypt the data. The research group down the hall of my own research group is currently working on porting encryption to QSC. Good luck with that NSA.
Ahh, so it's the logical fallacy "appeal to consequences". X can happen if you do Y, so Y should never be done. Sorry, but you're going to need to come up with a real argument.
I’d love to be a fly on the wall. I wonder if Tim will bring one of these to keep Biden engaged:
![FD13BEBB-8199-4A9C-9FC4-2302D178DD96.jpeg]( "FD13BEBB-8199-4A9C-9FC4-2302D178DD96.jpeg")
They are looking for illegal content. THey do not wish to have their services and their servers be used for sexual abuse imagery. The third party they're sharing it with are those who prosecute such crimes.
Nice try, but you need a bit more stronger of an argument than that.
Industrial Engineering is like Management Engineering. Basically jack of all trades, master of lip service. It's at the same level as an ice cream Engineer.
You are ignoring the premise while claiming I'm naive. That is a logical fallacy known as "argumentum ad hominem".
Last edited:
They will 100% be lobbying Big Tech for ways government can bypass encryption of private communications. No doubt about it.
Sure… and I have a bridge to sell you.
Wrong. Did you even read the article? Reuters article says "Though coming mainly from employees outside of lead security and privacy roles, the pushback marks a shift for a company where a strict code of secrecy around new products colors other aspects of the corporate culture."
I'm willing to bet you only read the headline and incorrectly assumed it was the CSAM engineers that complained.
Apple's core security employees think so.
"Core security employees did not appear to be major complainants in the posts, and some of them said that they thought Apple's solution was a reasonable response to pressure to crack down on illegal material."
"Other employees said they hoped that the scanning is a step toward fully encrypting iCloud for customers who want it"
www.reuters.com
Look at how that backfired.
Your sarcasm isn't good btw. Kind of insulting and didn't contribute much to the discussion so I'm going stop arguing with you. Have a good one.
Wrong. Did you even read the article? Reuters article says "Though coming mainly from employees outside of lead security and privacy roles, the pushback marks a shift for a company where a strict code of secrecy around new products colors other aspects of the corporate culture."
I'm willing to bet you only read the headline and incorrectly assumed it was the CSAM engineers that complained.
Apple's core security employees think so.
"Core security employees did not appear to be major complainants in the posts, and some of them said that they thought Apple's solution was a reasonable response to pressure to crack down on illegal material."
"Other employees said they hoped that the scanning is a step toward fully encrypting iCloud for customers who want it"
Exclusive: Apple's child protection features spark concern within its own ranks -sources
A backlash over Apple's move to scan U.S. customer phones and computers for child sex abuse images has grown to include employees speaking out internally, a notable turn in a company famed for its secretive culture, as well as provoking intensified protests from leading technology policy groups.
Look at how that backfired.
Your sarcasm isn't good btw. Kind of insulting and didn't contribute much to the discussion so I'm going stop arguing with you. Have a good one.
Joe will ask Tim what sort of Apples his business grows. Then he’ll order apple juice in a sippy cup.
biden doesn’t even know what the internet is, let alone cyber security. Still stronger than his foreign policy experience though.
How many emails do you think were sent between them all trying to decide which video conferencing service to use? Saying that, I’m sure it’s an in-person meeting. The top executives of these companies don’t really believe in those services. They really only care about making more money. Time to remove these old farts.
Smile.
Well, one could say the same for you. X is only X so there is no need to consider Y.
Such thinking would mean there is no need for redundant systems, contingencies, excess margins and more. To state one should NOT consider alternative outcomes, unintended consequences, etc is to ignore centuries of thought, science engineering, and indeed warfare.
