Under your flawed logic people who donate their time to homeless shelters can’t be taken seriously unless they also work to stop persecution of Chinese nationals by their own government.
Maybe the more sensible conclusion is people do whatever they can under the circumstances, and that we should be grateful when anyone does something to make the world a better place.
what have YOU done to end the problem in Hong Kong?
Wow, what an amazingly bad false analogy. Using your example if the people who worked in homeless shelters were exercising two-faced behaviour to gain profit at the expense of other people while dictating to the world the ethics of helping the homeless, you would have a shadow of a point. But you don't! So here we are.
It's one thing to do nothing (as you are implying Apple is doing with that analogy), its another thing entirely to bend the knee and be complicit in oppression to maintain a profit (which is what Apple is actually doing). See the difference?
So I will be damned before I get lectured to by Apple about its "concern" for my lungs, eggless salad emoji, water gun emoji, veterans day websites, rainbow watch faces. Or anything else Apple makes out its a good guy on. While it
HELPS the Chinese government persecute its own people, all to maintain a business in the country. Make no mistake removing the vapourware *giggles* is only to protect Apple from possible litigation in the future, because it's currently a hot topic. Not your safety, but profit.