Where do all the profits and top-tier benefits go at non-union companies? Hmmmmmm…Unions are a ponzi scheme. Where do all those union dues go? Hmmmmmm…
Where do all the profits and top-tier benefits go at non-union companies? Hmmmmmm…Unions are a ponzi scheme. Where do all those union dues go? Hmmmmmm…
Oklahomans didn't vote on Apple Penn Square's unionization; Apple Penn Square employees did. Even then, just because Oklahoma is one of the reddest states in the country doesn't mean that it doesn't have its purple and even blue areas — surely it would not surprise you that OKC is one such area.Lol, you should make sure you are certain what is being said before accusing others of dramatics. Being surprised that a typically conservative state that staunchly supports anti-union “right-to-work” policies is where a second store unionized rather than in more labor friendly states is far from dramatic, unless one isn’t sure what right-to-work laws are and what they are designed to do.
Saying you are surprised a state with such a large right-wing population is neither a pro or anti-union statement, nor is it one that implies anything will change.
Right now they're making less than the non-union employees and have less benefits, because Apple wasn't able to give them the benefits the others got.
Ideally, meritocracy should be it. However, just reading stories here, clearly there are plenty of problematic Apple employees even at the retail level that don't reflect the service that Apple seemed to offer in the olden days. Also, the Burberry lady had created customer hostile policies in the name of profit, and seems like it's sticking despite she's out already. Apple is too big now to see the needle from the haystack, and meritocracy has taken a sideline in the name of virtue signalling and wokeness. If that's the case, then I can see how the workers think they would prefer opting for a union. Again, I'm sure this decision didn't come out overnight. There must be a piling dissatisfactions and other things throughout the years. Something is rotting inside. And offering carrots won't solve the problem unless Tim Cook is willing to get his hand dirty, get the scalpel and take out the tumors out himself.Not exactly… Because of seniority, the longer a worker has been at a union store, the more protection/security they have. Apple will always want to stick to a merit based retention for example, just based on customer satisfaction. 🤷
Apple might not have many stores left after a few years.Just close the store and be done with this nonsense.
You’re thinking of politicians.Unions are the worst in modern times. All unions do is promote laziness and cause problems for customers and employers.
Unions made sense in the 1800s, but they've outlived their usefulness and are now the epitome of greed and corruption.
What law is out there requiring a business to stay open in a certain area?That would be illegal
That would be illegal
I read what they said, "Such a sad state of our society." as "It's really sad that workers have to unionize to get a fair deal from a company that raked in $83 BILLION DOLLARS in last QUARTER alone."You obviously don't work in retail and for Apple. You should be happy for the employees! Better pay and working conditions ahead.
But why?The only ones who benefit from unionization are the union leadership and the Democrat Party.
The rest are merely cogs in a machine…
No it wouldn'tThat would be illegal
Yes, apple had to let the disgruntled go so the non-gruntled will have a more cohesive environment. I’m guessing they knew that that’s why they let the fellow walk.To me, this shows that there's a problem with Apple's HR. I mean even after the carrot Apple dangled with the increased benefits, people are still opting to unionize. That means there's something wrong with you as a company. Your ML head left just like that because wfo policy. That means there's already an underlying dissatisfaction. Apple, review your HR team and policies. You're rotting from the inside. Catch it before it's too late.
Of course Apple was able to. You should think again about why they chose not to. I really wonder why Apple is against unions… unless it’s because they want to ensure higher profit it doesn’t make sense.Right now they're making less than the non-union employees and have less benefits, because Apple wasn't able to give them the benefits the others got.
Depends... If it were true what you say, then the Ponzi-Masters have an interest to increase wages of the workers because the fees are % based of the pay.Unions are a ponzi scheme. Where do all those union dues go? Hmmmmmm…
And so are the "this is not a swastika, this is a Slavic/Celtic/Nordic whatnot symbol" crowd are merely a grass on somebody else's playground(transnational capital comes to mind).The only ones who benefit from unionization are the union leadership and the Democrat Party.
The rest are merely cogs in a machine…