They say as they make an overpriced monitor with a proprietary nonreplacable power cord and a new eWaste accessory for 1st gen Apple Pencils to work with 10th gen iPads.
Is it better to make an adaptor for existing pencils to work with new iPads, or make people throw away Apple Pencil 1s and replace with Apple pencil 2s?They say as they make an overpriced monitor with a proprietary nonreplacable power cord and a new eWaste accessory for 1st gen Apple Pencils to work with 10th gen iPads.
Being carbon neutral just means not increasing the net carbon in the atmosphere. It doesn’t mean the entities don’t create pollution in general. It doesn’t account for the growing size of landfills.The irony in releasing new dongles, plastic stickers in nearly every package, and apparently certain executives investing in bitcoin (not sure if true).
Is it better to make an adaptor for existing pencils to work with new iPads, or make people throw away Apple Pencil 1s and replace with Apple pencil 2s?
Is making the adaptor better or worse for the environement vs making the Apple pencil 2?Replace it with Apple Pencil 2s objectively. The Gen 1 is horrible and should've been retired years ago. That Pencil is fragile and has killed so many lightning ports with how easy it is to snap the male lightning connector off, and this new solution to make them work on one iPad type is even more asinine.
Right, but what if the time came to pass on those costs to customers and only Apple has already done it? What if Samsung suddenly had to charge $400 extra for their devices and Apple didn't. That would cost Samsung valuable marketshare, otherwise Samsung would already be charging $400 more for their devices.
Marketshare is a means to an end, not the end itself. Profitability is the end.Apple do not care about marketshare because what they care about is getting rich and staying rich and they do a very good job of doing it.
Is making the adaptor better or worse for the environement vs making the Apple pencil 2?
How often do Apple Pencils break down and need to be replaced? Chucking away a perfectly funtional piece of equipment seems to be rather wasteful and definitely bad for the environment.The Pencil 1's gotta go and eventually it will have to go since it uses lightning, so just rip the bandaid off now because these adapters are gonna become useless in a couple of years anyway.
Not just expensive: toxic. Pillaging the ends of the earth rare minerals to make inefficient lithium batteries, with often underpaid if not forced/child labor doing the pillaging on behalf of Greta Thunburg & Friends?oh, but it has a downside: green energy is simply more expensive
which means suppliers need to raise prices
which means higher price for end customers
ecology is expensive (at least for now)
The 10th gen iPad was never going to get compatibility with the 2nd gen Apple Pencil either way.Is it better to make an adaptor for existing pencils to work with new iPads, or make people throw away Apple Pencil 1s and replace with Apple pencil 2s?
How often do Apple Pencils break down and need to be replaced? Chucking away a perfectly funtional piece of equipment seems to be rather wasteful and definitely bad for the environment.
I will say that Apple cares about the market share which actually makes them money. Not just market share for market share's sake.Apple do not care about marketshare because what they care about is getting rich and staying rich and they do a very good job of doing it.
I was really referring to the existing Apple Pencils that people have. If users can get a new iPad but continue to use their existing Apple Pencil 1, that saves the need to manufacturer and purchase an Apple Pencil 2.Apple Pencil Gen 1s are prone to many different issues, from easily losing it, to losing the lightning port cap and never finding it again leaving an exposed lightning connector, to the lightning connector prone to bending or snapping off entirely. Add that with the fact the damn thing can only be used on vanilla iPads while every other iPad uses the far superior Gen 2, and the pure existence of the Gen 1 nowadays is wasteful since they keep making it. When the 10th gen iPad got revealed they should've moved it to Gen 2 so all the iPads used the same pencil, but they didn't. Instead they're still making Gen 1s, and now making a dongle for said pencil that can only be used on one type of iPad, just so it can be used on one specific generation of that iPad.
I was really referring to the existing Apple Pencils that people have. If users can get a new iPad but continue to use their existing Apple Pencil 1, that saves the need to manufacturer and purchase an Apple Pencil 2.
Absolutely, if they get an iPad that doesn't support Apple Pencil 1 they will either have to buy an Apple Pencil 2 or do without.That's if they get a vanilla iPad. If they decide they want an iPad Pro they have a buy a Gen 2 as their Gen 1 does not work with any other iPads except the vanillas as Apple designed it not to pair with any iPads that use Gen 2. This is why I call the Gen 1 Apple Pencil eWaste.
Actually, renewable energy sources are the cheapest on the market right now, nuclear and fossil fuel based the most expensive, sometimes by a factor of 3-4. the big catch is that there's not enough capacity to store energy and the power grid is also still dependent on being fed a constant amount of energy from big soirces, so we need this expensive energyoh, but it has a downside: green energy is simply more expensive
which means suppliers need to raise prices
which means higher price for end customers
ecology is expensive (at least for now)
Not to mention the good PR. All the news in the world telling everyone that Apple's phone was already clean, people believing that Apple products are super clean and other products super dirty, and that perception will seem important when it's contrasted with news of real climate related disaster. Apple is playing 4D chess decades ahead of time while competitors are fixated on the next financial year.Apple do not care about marketshare because what they care about is getting rich and staying rich and they do a very good job of doing it.
And Tim Cook lets you know all about minutes after stepping off his private plane.Man tons of upset people. I believe Apple has done more for going “green” then most other companies. I remember a new article not long ago about how the data centers in London were causing power grid issues. Apple was not listed as one of the data centers.
Apple also offer millions if not billions of dollars to their supply chain members via programs every year.