Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
63,616
30,990


Several third-party browser companies have experienced a spike in iPhone installs since Apple made major changes to iOS in order to comply with the Digital Markets Act in the European Union, but many are not happy with Apple's implementation of its default browser choice screen.

alternative-browser-list-eu.jpg

In iOS 17.4, released last month, Apple no longer limits EU users to the handful of browser options that iOS currently offers as alternatives in other parts of the world. Instead, users in the EU who open Safari for the first time are presented with a choice screen that allows them to opt for a new default browser from a list of popular alternatives in their country.

The change has led to a sharp increase in third-party browser usage, based on several reports. On Wednesday, Reuters reported that users of privacy-first browser Aloha had jumped 250% in March. The jump in users largely came in France, Belgium (3x growth), Germany, The Netherlands, Spain and Sweden (2.5x growth), and Denmark, Italy and Poland (2x growth).

Aloha browser markets itself as a privacy focused alternative to browsers that earns its money through paid subscriptions rather than selling ads by tracking users. The Cyprus-based company says it has 10 million monthly average users.

"Before, EU was our number four market, right now it's number two," Aloha CEO Andrew Frost Moroz said in an interview with Reuters.

Norway's Vivaldi browser, Germany's Ecosia and U.S.-based Brave have all seen user numbers rise following the new regulation. U.S.-based DuckDuckGo, which has about 100 million users, and its more popular rival, Norway-based Opera, have also reported substantial increases.

To be eligible for consideration in the alternative browsers list, companies must have the Default Browser Entitlement that is available to developers. Apple also requires that the app has been downloaded by at least 5,000 iPhone users‌ across all 27 EU countries in the prior calendar year. Apple selects up to 11 of these for the browser choice screen in addition to Safari, updating the list once per calendar year.

Google has also updated its Pixel software to show alternative browser choices, and says that new Android devices made by other companies will also display the choice screen in the coming months.

Despite users increasingly choosing alternative options, browser companies have criticized Apple and Google for the slow rollout of the change, and believe it is hampering the migration away from Safari and Chrome. Mozilla, which owns Firefox, estimates that only around a fifth of iPhone users in the EU have received the iOS update, and claims that the rollout is much slower than Apple's previous software updates.

Some alternative browser makers are also concerned that the design of choice screens is sub-optimal at best. For example, Vivaldi CEO Jon Stephenson von Tetzchner notes that Apple's choice screen only appears when iPhone users open Safari, while the list of browsers provides no additional information.

"The process is just so convoluted that it's easiest for (users) to select Safari or potentially some other known name," he told Reuters.

Vivaldi is also unhappy with the design. "The list of browsers does not show additional information and that does not help users to make a meaningful choice," a company spokesperson told TechCrunch. "If the user has already selected a browser of their own choice, the choice screen can actively try to push them away from it, and may not even include it in the list that it presents to the user."

Ecosia has also been critical, and says Apple's implementation involves an "overly complex installation process" and keeps Safari front and center on the user's iPhone Home screen.

The European Commission is currently investigating Apple's choice screen design for suspected noncompliance. The probe is being conducted in consultation with browser companies, who are likely to encourage regulators to push for a stronger implementation to level the competitive playing field.

Article Link: Browser Companies Criticize Apple's EU Choice Screen in iOS 17.4
 
Last edited:

swiftapplefan

macrumors regular
Aug 25, 2023
215
902
Ok now this is going too far. It’s a selection screen, and it isn’t anticompetitive because Apple’s own product isn’t even at the top spots of the list. Not even Safari has a description. If users want to change their browsers they’ll search for what each does, if they don’t they clearly wouldn’t have switched.
All these competitors are going too far. Give them an inch and they’ll take a mile.
 

aespana

macrumors regular
Feb 21, 2020
123
104
Did the article say something about slow adoption from the user to the 17.4 update than normal… wonder if that alludes to something bigger.
Maybe Apple is not pushing the update as before?

An update that affects you is better to be released veeery slow
 

thays133

Suspended
Mar 25, 2021
528
988
I see nothing wrong with them complaining as what Apple made was a first pass. Something that should be iterated on and improved.

Also had to be watch for dark UX patterns as Apple is incentivizing to try to heavy push towards safari and make it harder to switch.

Updating things like this is fairly standard practice to iterated on it a few times. The process is going to be slower as Apple is going to drag their feet and multiple 3rd parties need to have some say in it.
 

contacos

macrumors 601
Nov 11, 2020
4,735
18,387
Mexico City living in Berlin
So picky. Obviously Apple is only going to do the least that is required. Do they expect free advertisement as well?

One screen that is of little use however, is the following when you download an app from the App Store like this screen is not going to stop any potential fraud / phishing app like what stops them from simply using fake screenshots of real apps, you would not be able to tell.

1712928917666.jpeg
 

ApAx

macrumors member
Sep 15, 2023
50
123
United States
1. “Vivaldi is also unhappy with the design. The list of browsers does not show additional information and that does not help users to make a meaningful choice… “

2. “If the user has already selected a browser of their own choice, the choice screen can actively try to push them away from it, and may not even include it in the list that it presents to the user."

1. Does Vivaldi seriously expect Apple to directly advertise/market for competing companies? If a user already knows they want something in particular, or wants to explore other options, they can discover on their own.

2. This is exactly what Microsoft has been doing in Windows with its Edge browser for years. There are still times when system app-embedded links will only open in Edge, despite multiple settings to open in a different browser of user choice. Nag screens pop up in system settings trying to trick the user to switching back to Edge.
 
Last edited:

jake.au

macrumors member
Jun 24, 2018
46
312
Sydney, Australia
  • select your default browser
  • select your default "ordered by" preference
  • select your default "preference selection" preference
  • select your default "selection" preference
  • select your default default preference
  • select your your preference
  • select preference your select
  • your select preference
  • prefer your select ence
  • you sleect rpefernce
  • please return your iPhone as we do not wish to do business with you
 

spazzcat

macrumors 68040
Jun 29, 2007
3,706
4,818
Did the article say something about slow adoption from the user to the 17.4 update than normal… wonder if that alludes to something bigger.
Likely people are not looking for all these unnecessary changes to iOS, at this point, the EU has jumped the shark. They have clearly solved all the critical issues in the EU and can spend time focusing on UX designs on iPhones.
 

apples_arrogance

macrumors member
May 21, 2020
53
48
Curious: What is the timeline the browser picker needs to be rolled out on Android phones? Google has rolled out the picker on pixel devices but the traveling time for third party phones will be longer. Certainly legislation gives an exact timeframe of when implementation has to hit users?
 

DanielDD

macrumors 6502a
Apr 5, 2013
524
4,447
Portugal
If the user has already selected a browser of their own choice, the choice screen can actively try to push them away from it, and may not even include it in the list that it presents to the user

The whole point of the ruling is to not discriminate against any browser. Why would the selected browser not be in the list? What if people want to keep their current browser?
 

icanhazmac

Contributor
Apr 11, 2018
2,527
9,478
"The process is just so convoluted that it's easiest for (users) to select Safari or potentially some other known name," he told Reuters.

Vivaldi is also unhappy with the design. "The list of browsers does not show additional information and that does not help users to make a meaningful choice,"

The vast majority of users don't care, they just want to browse. People who want a different browser have specific needs and have researched what they want.

All the "other" browsers should be happy that non-techie users are probably getting "tricked" by too many options and just selecting one at random.
 
Last edited:

abaxworld

macrumors regular
Nov 14, 2008
127
69
This update and changes are not because of us EU users, but because of the politician's pockets. They are not trying to make it more competitive but only making profits from lobbies and making more weak the OS. They want the control but only for their own interests and business. There are other areas where they could defend customers but they only want to target Apple to have a bigger portion of their profit's cake just for nothing. "Something is rotten in the state of Denmark ( I mean EU )"
 

Fuzzball84

macrumors 68020
Apr 19, 2015
2,035
4,475
Is there anything the EU is happy with and not investigating?
If its not happy and investigating… id say its doing its job.

The EU is not some mythical non human entity… it represents its member states, and hence people.

Microsoft went through this 20 plus years ago… and companies keep doing the same things expecting a different outcome.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.