But it isn’t the voice of a robot. It’s the voice of a man or a woman.This isn't social justice. You as a person can identify however you'd like but that doesn't mean that the people (robots?) speaking to you have to do the same.
But it isn’t the voice of a robot. It’s the voice of a man or a woman.This isn't social justice. You as a person can identify however you'd like but that doesn't mean that the people (robots?) speaking to you have to do the same.
Airforce studies find that pilots are more likely to respond to a female voice than a male one. For the same reason, alert signals are tuned to the frequenzy of a crying infant.I’ve always thought standard female voices on assistants are disgustingly promoting the cliché of someone’s secretary being a woman (hence a woman in an office is probably the secretary).
Not sure why people in the progressive Silicon Valley thought it just felt natural to give firm and rude orders to a woman.
No one has ever said that.You know what? I give up, you are right. I AM offended that male, female, mom, dad, his, hers, he, she can no longer be used because some folks decide those words should no longer be use and somehow are offended by them. Get over yourselves folks. There I said it.
(OK so really I don't care what Apple does but I do think its stupid as F***.)
The overwhelming majority of Airforce pilots are men.Airforce studies find that pilots are more likely to respond to a female voice than a male one. For the same reason, alert signals are tuned to the frequenzy of a crying infant.
I think the assistant voices are by default female because female voices are generally considered more soothing (global mommy syndrome).
I also assumed this. You point being, though..?The overwhelming majority of Airforce pilots are men.
The question is what was your point -- I was just making sure it was clear that this study wasn't reflective of the general population since the subjects are mostly men.I also assumed this. You point being, though..?
If science proves there is, then there is...So what if there were?
If a friend of yours told you they identified as both male and female, why isn't that enough? Why should anyone care to tell them if they're right or wrong about how they or anyone else self-identifies?If science proves there is, then there is...
You’re clearly struggling with comprehending the root cause of the resistance here.This is literally not true. Sounds like hysteria to me.
Denial mate. Denial. ?No one has ever said that.
The audacity to compare this nonsense with the monstrosity of racism and women’s rights. Just wow. ?un
Until one very particular day women couldn't vote, black people couldn't sit at the front of the bus, email didn't exist, you didn't exist. This is not an argument for thins staying the way they were and it is not papering over reality to say that you were born and should continue to live in this world.
Nothing you just described remotely takes away anyone’s ability to identify as strictly male or female. Why is it that whenever we try to be more inclusive, some of the ones already included perceive that as a loss rather than a gain?You’re clearly struggling with comprehending the root cause of the resistance here.
I feel the question you asked have already been answered in ELI5 language by both myself and others.
If it’s not true and just hysteria, provide evidence that removal of male and female isn’t occurring more and more, little bit by little bit. HINT: we are actually discussing how Apples just removed the label of male and female voices in order to be genre neutral. ?
Let’s rewind a couple of months where hospitals were looking at removing the name breast milk to chest milk to not offend transgender.
Not happening you say ?
I didn’t compare it to anything. I pointed out that there are countless examples of times before something changed, which is no reason for those things to stay as they were. I’m sorry you missed that but I made it very clear.The audacity to compare this nonsense with the monstrosity of racism and women’s rights. Just wow. ?
The audacity to describe women’s rights as a monstrosity. Just wow ?The audacity to compare this nonsense with the monstrosity of racism and women’s rights. Just wow. ?
Thats not the same thing. But of course I would accept them. Friend or not. However belief doesnt change science.If a friend of yours told you they identified as both male and female, why isn't that enough? Why should anyone care to tell them if they're right or wrong about how they or anyone else self-identifies?
Science is the process by which we test and measure a hypothesis to formulate a theory. It’s an ongoing and elastic process that constantly overturns the previous understanding science itself provided. I’m sure there’s science from a hundred years ago that would state there are only two genders just as sure as I am the latest science would reveal that’s not the case. Problem is which science are people going to want to believe? The old one that aligns with their own beliefs or the new one that challenges them? It’s never as simple as if science says it then that’s it.Thats not the same thing. But of course I would accept them. Friend or not. However belief doesnt change science.
This isn’t oppression. This is your allies being rational.
Yeah that’s my point.Science is the process by which we test and measure a hypothesis to formulate a theory. It’s an ongoing and elastic process that constantly overturns the previous understanding science itself provided. I’m sure there’s science from a hundred years ago that would state there are only two genders just as sure as I am the latest science would reveal that’s not the case. Problem is which science are people going to want to believe? The old one that aligns with their own beliefs or the new one that challenges them? It’s never as simple as if science says it then that’s it.
There’s a lot of transphobic people in these comments
I thought your point was belief doesn’t change science and rational thinking wins. I’m saying both rarely hold true.Yeah that’s my point.
Erm English comprehension skills would go along way mate. Or are you choosing just to take my words out of context?. Perhaps I’ve failed in delivering my views. I think continuing this conversation with someone that’s unable to see the bigger picture is just a waste of both our time. Have a great Easter break. Good luck to you.The audacity to describe women’s rights as a monstrosity. Just wow ?
Looks like you don’t see the irony on full display here. Good luck to you.Erm English comprehension skills would go along way mate. Or are you choosing just to take my words out of context?. Perhaps I’ve failed in delivering my views. I think continuing this conversation with someone that’s unable to see the bigger picture is just a waste of both our time. Have a great Easter break. Good luck to you.
You know what? I give up, you are right. I AM offended that male, female, mom, dad, his, hers, he, she can no longer be used because some folks decide those words should no longer be used and are somehow offended by them. Get over yourselves folks. There I said it.
(OK so really I don't care what Apple does but I do think its stupid as F***.)