They don't care if you watch porn or cheat on your wives, or what political party you belong to.
They may not care about 1 or 2, but today I'm not so sure about 3.
They don't care if you watch porn or cheat on your wives, or what political party you belong to.
Unfortunately that also means me - a US citizen living overseas. There are 3-6 million of us according to the State Department.
When did N. Koreans ever have any rights to be eroded?
It actually does stop terrorist acts.
You just don't know it.
This is more of a legal gray area that needs clarification by the US legislature. From what I've seen is that the communications (not metadata) are filtered out for US citizens overseas. Not sure.
It actually does stop terrorist acts.
You just don't know it.
Exactly.
It's sort of their job, and the reason we pay them, to spy on foreign targets.
Evidence? Certainly in the UK events have indicated that most terrorists are incompetent - like the fools who tried to suicide bomb Glasgow airport. Our reaction to terrorism is way out of proportion to the risk. All the money spent of surveillance programs could be spent improving the well being of the nation in other ways that are probably more effective. Moreover, having this surveillance only gives an illusion of safety, as shown by the Boston bombing.
What might stop terrorists is the US refraining from sticking pencils in hornets nests all around the world. Terrorists don't want to blow up people in another country for no reason, they want to do it because foreigners come in trying to be world police and f with their country. Besides, there's documentaries out there where former NSA employees say they knew that terrorists were in the USA just before 9/11, but they failed to notify the FBI -- look them up.
If they wanted the illusion of safety, they wouldn't classify it... lol making it secret sorta defeats that point of that, doesn't it?
You're probably thinking Dept. of Homeland Security, not the NSA.
----------
Again, the hornet's nest problem is not an NSA issue. That's more of a problem with the US legislature/US public.
They're limited by laws stating that the US military cannot act in the capacity of law-enforcement for government.
The NSA is part of the US military.
This is the world we live in now. Gotta take the good with the bad.
I don't believe there is any conspiracy or 'evil' behind this, it's simply how such a huge conglomeration of human beings with preposterous abilities have evolved.
I'd certainly rather be living now than in medieval Europe.
As long as they're foreign targets, it's fine.
US Citizenship - membership has its privileges.
So just curious... if the government (yours or any) decided to put a camera in everyone's living rooms.... would you not complain then either? I mean, you aren't "hiding anything" are you?
When you decide to protest the government in the future and a police officer shows up to arrest you before you attend, you can thank Angry Birds and your own intellectual laziness in the statement that you have nothing to hide. I don't have anything to hide, but I'll be ****ing damned if I'm going to let you in on my personal details and location so you can check up on me non-voluntarily.
If someone is being targeted there has to be a reason, and that reason should be good enough to get a warrant.
... says the guy posting from Toronto, Canada.
Exactly.
It's sort of their job, and the reason we pay them, to spy on foreign targets.
Besides the fact that the NSA routinely does spy on U.S citizens, it's funny how a lot of people act like no-one outside America matters when it comes to spying... cause' we're all terrorists and commies and socialists
There's a difference between information I choose to share and information that is forcefully taken. Know what that is? Choice.
Well, I have seen no evidence whatsoever that this surveillance has prevented competent attacks that would do sufficient damage to justify the financial and ethical costs of the surveillance. The fact that Obama did not stamp on this suggests to me that I should stop donating to his party....
In any case, time for Apple to provide an API for encrypting all meta-data used by apps. They already encrypt the iPhone. At least this would prevent Bob-the-vaguely-curious at the NSA from knowing everything about my life....
... says the guy posting from Toronto, Canada.
Well, since Snowden released all the documents on the NSA, I'm sure you can find the ones pointing out where they spied on the private communications of Americans?
The correct answer is that: The NSA stops at metadata for Americans.
You know that most of NASA is private contractors right, Nasa didn't just build Apollo on their own.You're making the mistake of thinking metadata is private.
I want you to come to a place to make sure you understand that metadata was never private communications, and when government collects metadata, it doesn't intercept private communications.
Metadata is everything EXCEPT your private communications. Even not communicating is metadata.
----------
Wow so SpaceX is finally catching up to what government was doing 50 years ago.
As long as they're foreign targets, it's fine.
US Citizenship - membership has its privileges.