As an aside, I'm having optics related issues that may actually lead me to return this thing. My RX (that works perfectly fine in Quest 3 with Zenni Optical inserts) doesn't seem to allow me to *always* get razor sharp on the displays and causes eye strain trying to get there. Sometimes if I fidget with the headset and push it to one side or another, or at the very beginning of the day when I'm fresh and well hydrated, I can get 100% crisp displays but looking back at the last three days it's been a struggle more than I would hope a $3500 product to offer. After my first couple hours with it, it gets harder and harder to maintain a perfectly crisp view. I don't have this experience in the Quest.
I have an adjusted RX that I just ordered a second set of $150 Zeiss inserts for, but due to the abysmal logistics on these (and the lack of in-store dispensing like many eyeglasses stores can do), any new lenses come on a slow boat from China and I won't have the updated one until 2/14, so I'll burn the entire return window waiting for lenses that may or may not solve the issue.
I put my Quest 3 back on for reference and man, I hate to say it but it's a breath of fresh air. The optics and displays are a hundred times easier on your eyes, the lenses are bigger and the setup offers expansive FOV in both directions that beats the AVP. The FOV I can forgive, but how on earth did Apple spend all this time and R&D and come up with a $3500 product with optics that are harder on the user's eyes than a $500 Quest 3?
I then took my Quest 3's $60 Zenni optical inserts (that have the same RX as my current Zeiss inserts) out and taped them in my AVP, as I'm now stuck waiting 10 days for a solution and I'm trying to experiment and troubleshoot:
The weird part is these $60 quest 3 lenses seem to offer a slightly closer to 100% experience than the $150 Zeiss ones, with the same RX: a weak -1.25 in both eyes.
This is now quickly turning into a reason to return the AVP and I hate that because the software and navigation is so nice. I really feel like the optics are janky and it's screwing with my eyes.
I have an adjusted RX that I just ordered a second set of $150 Zeiss inserts for, but due to the abysmal logistics on these (and the lack of in-store dispensing like many eyeglasses stores can do), any new lenses come on a slow boat from China and I won't have the updated one until 2/14, so I'll burn the entire return window waiting for lenses that may or may not solve the issue.
I put my Quest 3 back on for reference and man, I hate to say it but it's a breath of fresh air. The optics and displays are a hundred times easier on your eyes, the lenses are bigger and the setup offers expansive FOV in both directions that beats the AVP. The FOV I can forgive, but how on earth did Apple spend all this time and R&D and come up with a $3500 product with optics that are harder on the user's eyes than a $500 Quest 3?
I then took my Quest 3's $60 Zenni optical inserts (that have the same RX as my current Zeiss inserts) out and taped them in my AVP, as I'm now stuck waiting 10 days for a solution and I'm trying to experiment and troubleshoot:
The weird part is these $60 quest 3 lenses seem to offer a slightly closer to 100% experience than the $150 Zeiss ones, with the same RX: a weak -1.25 in both eyes.
This is now quickly turning into a reason to return the AVP and I hate that because the software and navigation is so nice. I really feel like the optics are janky and it's screwing with my eyes.