It’s there product, if you don’t like the restrictions use something else.Good. Apple has a stranglehold over iOS that is LONG overdue for antitrust scrutiny & legislative action. Apple's monopoly needs to end
It’s there product, if you don’t like the restrictions use something else.Good. Apple has a stranglehold over iOS that is LONG overdue for antitrust scrutiny & legislative action. Apple's monopoly needs to end
Agreed. If you don’t like how Apple is restricting your abilities to download whatever apps you want on your $799 iPhone 13, Google would be happy to sell you a similar phone for $599 that lets you install whatever you want.It’s there product, if you don’t like the restrictions use something else.
The NY Post wrote a true story about Hunter Biden. The tech media spiked it.
Whether or not he committed an actual crime, he’s a scumbag who cheated on his wife with his dead brother’s widow.
This x 100Bagging on "Big Tech" and Apple especially is very popular politically right now.
Notice who nobody dares to touch?
The telecoms. AT&T, Comcast etc. are far more of a monopoly than Facebook or Google ever will be, and yet they are not only invulnerable and invisible, we have to keep pouring millions and millions of tax dollars into them, to continue having garbage internet.
Exactly, you have the freedom to use something else.Agreed. If you don’t like how Apple is restricting your abilities to download whatever apps you want on your $799 iPhone 13, Google would be happy to sell you a similar phone for $599 that lets you install whatever you want.
Um...yes they can. Apple has the freedom to add or remove features in iOS as they see fit. It is their product.Uhm no the certainly can not
I was pleasantry surprise I can play my silly iOS game on my new MacBook Pro 13" M1. Maybe someone should tell Apple this? 🤔😄I'd be fine with it yeah, but MacOS is not iOS and it's annoying how people keep trying to combine the two of them together. They are separate for a reason. Just because Apple does something with one of them doesn't mean they will or should do it with the other.
If you think that has anything to do with politics at all, you're crazy. It's solely to do with being able to do business there.It’s well known that the PRC can say or do whatever they want. Eddy Cue even infamously said that one of Apple’s core rules is never criticize the PRC.
Useless conjecture. The idea that the right doesn’t have their own grudge against big tech is absurd. Did you miss the outcry on the right when Apple booted Parler?Some unelected bureaucrat “resisting” the then-current administration.
The Right has a legitimate grudge.Useless conjecture. The idea that the right doesn’t have their own grudge against big tech is absurd. Did you miss the outcry on the right when Apple booted Parler?
Yes but the software is on license. You don't own that.No..................... the iPhone is MINE at least according to the very expensive receipt.
Republicans benefit from Facebook. Their only complaint has been more recent, when the propaganda chief was blocked.Depends who's is office determines which companies are targeted. Democrats have no reason to go after Facebook as they are on their side. If (when) republicans are back in office they will target social networks that have a perceived liberal agenda.
Apples monopoly on its own product?Good. Apple has a stranglehold over iOS that is LONG overdue for antitrust scrutiny & legislative action. Apple's monopoly needs to end
Except the facts disagree with you and demonstrate that Facebook, Twitter, Goggle, etc. actively allowed Republicans to ignore their policies and actively promoted content that was beneficial to Republicans. There is no perceived liberal agenda there is an ACTUAL conservative agenda.Depends who's is office determines which companies are targeted. Democrats have no reason to go after Facebook as they are on their side. If (when) republicans are back in office they will target social networks that have a perceived liberal agenda.
That's your choice but your fear of what may happen doesn't trump what I should be able to do with my phone
You’re wrong. A prosecutor can only charge things under their purview. A city prosecutor cannot prosecute a felony, for example. In my state felonies are at the county prosecutor level. So a DA cannot prosecute someone for a federal crime. Only a federal prosecutor can do that, and those are part of the executive branch. It would literally need Garland/Biden’s approval to move forward. So the only scenario where it does is when a special prosecutor is appointed to avoid the huge conflict of interest, which requires congress… which is controlled by democrats.If Hunter Biden committed actual crimes... you better believe someone would investigate.
How many Republican Congress and Senate members are ex-lawyers? Hundreds?
Any of them could make a phone call to their local DA and open a case.
The fact that they haven't... really says something.
It sounds like the Hunter Biden story is a Fox News talking point... with no real merit behind it. But I dunno.
I've heard a lot of people say things about Hunter Biden. But I haven't seen anyone do anything about Hunter Biden.
You can do whatever you want with your phone. That doesn’t mean Apple should be forced to help you. You don’t have a right to a phone that meets all your demands, none of us do. If you don’t like what Apple offers you are free to buy from one of its many competitors. Samsung, Google, LG, etc.That's your choice but your fear of what may happen doesn't trump what I should be able to do with my phone
Apple don’t have any monopoly! Want Monopoly check out android! They are on almost every single smart phone and pushed out windows phones…with apple you only get iOS and the iOS is ONLY for appleGood. Apple has a stranglehold over iOS that is LONG overdue for antitrust scrutiny & legislative action. Apple's monopoly needs to end
You’re wrong. A prosecutor can only charge things under their purview. A city prosecutor cannot prosecute a felony, for example. In my state felonies are at the county prosecutor level. So a DA cannot prosecute someone for a federal crime. Only a federal prosecutor can do that, and those are part of the executive branch. It would literally need Garland/Biden’s approval to move forward. So the only scenario where it does is when a special prosecutor is appointed to avoid the huge conflict of interest, which requires congress… which is controlled by democrats.
During the debate (or debacle) last year Trump questioned Biden's son actions to his face.Yeah ok... I'm not a law expert, clearly.
My point was... Hunter Biden's name always pops up as a Republican talking point. If the guy did something wrong... then go get him.
Otherwise... I don't want to hear about him.
Good to see that you realize why your earlier comment was so laughable then.The Right has a legitimate grudge.
Font let the door hit yo on the ass on your way out.Good. Apple has a stranglehold over iOS that is LONG overdue for antitrust scrutiny & legislative action. Apple's monopoly needs to end