Mom always told me, do not blindly trust what the media, the politicians and your girl friend says.
It is unbelievable how political everything is in China. Apple removed the app or it turns into a big boycott of Apple products in China.
Equally unbelievable is it appears most Chinese citizens are brain-washed and would quickly do their duty and boycott Apple for political reasons.
Huawei's CEO saying he admires Apple is not a good thing. This means Apple is a direct target for industrial espionage, reverse engineering, copying, etc.
India is a democracy and a better place for Apple's manufacturing goals. China has proved they're setting-up to be a major antagonist for the West.
US lawmakers seem to have double standards because when Israel ask them to do things like ban Israeli protests on US campuses they seem to oblige and I don’t hear anyone here complaining about it. This is hypocrisy to say the least . What would happen to an app if an app was created and listed on the Apple store to where Campus protests were taking place in the US against Israeli policies? Who would bet that such an app would never be allowed to list..? Both China and Israel would argue that such a map adds fuel to protests. Israel would argue that it fuels anti-semitism, China would argue it fuels hatred of China, and Hong Kong would argue that it restricts freedom of speech and right to protest.
U.S lawmakers on Friday sent a letter to Apple CEO Tim Cook expressing concern over Apple's decision to remove the HKMap Live app from the App Store after complaints from the Chinese Government.
The letter [PDF] calls Apple's removal of the HKMap Live app "disappointing" and points out a prior quote from Tim Cook that reads "At Apple, we are not afraid to say that our values drive our curation decisions."
The HKMap Live app, which was used by protestors in Hong Kong to crowdsource information about street closures and police presence, was pulled from the App Store in early October.
Apple later reversed course and approved the app, allowing it back into the App Store, but after China accused Apple of "protecting rioters," Apple removed the app once again and it has remained unavailable.
According to U.S lawmakers, the HKMap Live app lets peaceful demonstrators to share locations to keep out of harm's way. Apple, says the letter, has also censored "at least 2200 apps in China," including VPN apps and apps made by and for "oppressed ethnic minorities."
The letter goes on to accuse Apple of complicity in China's efforts to block change, and questions whether Apple is willing to bow to Chinese demands to avoid losing access to Chinese consumers.When the app was pulled for the final time, Apple CEO Tim Cook told Apple employees that based on "credible information" from Hong Kong police, the app was being used to target individual officers for violence.The letter from the lawmakers ends by urging Apple to reverse course and re-allow the HKMaps on the App Store.The letter was written by Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., Sen. Maro Rubio, R-Fla., Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas along with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., Rep. Mike Gallagher, R-Wisc., and Rep. Tom Malinowski, D-N.J. A similar letter was also sent to Blizzard following Blizzard's decision to ban Ng Wai Chung, a Hearthstone player who voiced support for the pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong.
Note: Due to the political nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.
Article Link: U.S. Lawmakers Call Apple's Move to Remove HKMap Live App 'Deeply Concerning'
That wasn’t the question. The OP asked what if each state made its own laws.True, but when you commit crimes in other states in the US like killing someone in another state don’t they send you to that state to be tried in that state? Also, if you commit a traffic violation in another state aren’t you held responsible in that particular state?
To be fair the USA is behind most of the protests. We're basically trying to peacefully overthrow the government there but I'm not sure if that will work. If the USA can get control of HK it would be an awesome economic advantage.US lawmakers seem to have double standards because when Israel ask them to do things like ban Israeli protests on US campuses they seem to oblige and I don’t hear anyone here complaining about it. This is hypocrisy to say the least . What would happen to an app if an app was created and listed on the Apple store to where Campus protests were taking place in the US against Israeli policies? Who would bet that such an app would never be allowed to list..? Both China and Israel would argue that such a map adds fuel to protests. Israel would argue that it fuels anti-semitism, China would argue it fuels hatred of China, and Hong Kong would argue that it restricts freedom of speech and right to protest.
As you can see US lawmakers can often be biased and hypocritical picking to their likings.
Revealed: rightwing push to suppress criticism of Israel on US campuses
Documents seen by Guardian show fresh attack on university debate under the guise of prohibiting antisemitismwww.google.com
Great post. One thing to add: the mainland government compels Hong Kong to accept hundreds of mainland Chinese as new residents of Hong Kong every day. Not so clever way to erase cultural distinction. I know many native Hong Kong people resent this policy in a deep way.Judging by your reasoning, I can tell that you never lived or traveled abroad, let alone Asia. It appears that you know nothing about Chinese people and their mentality.
Nobody is siding with violent protesters. But for you suggest that all Hong Kongese protesters are violent is very distasteful. I sense extreme bias on your end. No matter how level-headed the protests become, you will find a reason to disapprove of their cause.
Your claim of protesters vandalizing businesses operated by mainland Chinese citizens is a misinterpretation of the ordeal. First off, the violent protesters have targeted mainland businesses that have direct ties to the CCP. I can cite many examples: Chinese banks, MTR stations, and even the local StarBucks is franchised and operated by someone in the mainland who condemned the protests. There wasn't a single private Chinese business that was vandalized without a motive. The "private" property you speak of belong to shop owners who have publicly voiced their displeasure with the movement and pledged allegiance to the CCP. And then people like you wonder why these businesses are targeted. That's exactly why.
Nobody is defending the actions of those who vandalise property in HK. But mainland Chinese and the rest of the world need not be surprised when their businesses are set on fire after publicly ridiculing what was initially a peaceful movement for a good cause.
What the media doesn't tell you is that there's no shortage of mainland Chinese who come to HK to provoke the protesters by screaming "One China!". They are no less responsible for the violence than some of the protesters are. Not to mention half of the HK police force are "reinforcements" sent in by the CCP.
They are not but many get a lot of practice.So many people in the USA have terrible grammar. I don't have perfect grammar myself. Pointing out he uses your instead of you're doesn't mean he's part of the "50 cent army". I suspect they would be trained on using proper grammar.
Great post. One thing to add: the mainland government compels Hong Kong to accept hundreds of mainland Chinese as new residents of Hong Kong every day. Not so clever way to erase cultural distinction. I know many native Hong Kong people resent this policy in a deep way.
[automerge]1571622567[/automerge]
They are not but many get a lot of practice.
Human can be used to conduct illicit activities. Should we ban all humans according to this logic? XD.lol what?! Apple doesn’t “force” you to use iMessage. You are more then welcome to use third party messaging apps that are available, and you argument is nonsensical to say the least. Swords are used to kill people therefore we should ban all knives. Phones are used to make illegal transactions, lets ban all phones. Lol
There are different levels of right and wrong. If Apple is directly aiding human rights abuse, I would be all over it. For instance, if Apple is handing over live location of protesters, we should be all totally disgusted.The monster in the room, towering over the elephant, is the Leftist-relatavistic mindset that our education system has caused people to reason in the way mutmac has:
1 - there is no right and wrong.
2 - anyone who says that someone else, whom I agree with, is wrong, is speaking hate-speech.
3 - there is no right and wrong, so whatever laws other countries make are fine, and no one can criticise the laws of other countries.
4 - US corporations should just abide by whatever laws of other countries, with no consideration that a small number of nations have crossed the line, in terms of totalitarian regimes. The above post is rooted in the basic notion that there is no right and wrong, and we should not criticise.
As the U.S. society veers towards a socialist-leftist mindset - departing from the ethics of the foundation generations, this type of thinking, exemplified by the quoted post, will become more and more acceptable in American society.
There are different levels of right and wrong. If Apple is directly aiding human rights abuse, I would be all over it. For instance, if Apple is handing over live location of protesters, we should be all totally disgusted.
But in this case, Apple banning an app used by protesters, which merely inconveniences protesters.
Ding, now that I got your attention, ISIS uses already iMessages, Whatsapp, Facebook, and other means(forums and such), should we shut down the internet?But if it was an ISIS app being removed, you wouldn't mind at all.
No i wouldn't.But if it was an ISIS app being removed, you wouldn't mind at all.
tbh, this is as american as it gets.At the end of the day, the U.S. government wants the United States to do business and trade with China despite the fact that it's an authoritarian government that is known to crack down on any type of dissent.
Apple was given evidence that this app was used to attack Chinese police officers. It was not used to attack US police officers. So clearly in this particular situation, what the Chinese government thinks _should_ count more than what the US government thinks.It's simple. Companies care more about what the Chinese government thinks than what any other government thinks. The US might have crazy politicians, but they're not going to block Apple from doing business. China could pull the plug on Apple, and any other company, for the slightest reason. Companies can handle the US government being disappointed in them, but they can't handle China being disappointed in them.
That's not what Apple said, and you know it.But Apple's argument is that this map should be banned because the Chinese government says people can use the map to know where places are and then go to those places and commit crimes in those places
This app makes it possible to find places with no police (where you can protest without being attacked by police, which is fine), or to find places with a single police officer (where a group of people can go and beat up a police officer without much risk, which is not fine). The app very much helps with the second use. At least that's what Apple was told.Lol what? Neither app makes crimes possible; crime was already possible before the iPhone was ever invented. And neither app makes crimes happen either; criminals make crime happen. You could maybe use the argument that this app makes crimes easier, but then you could still say that about tons of other apps. I could use the Find My Friends app (another Apple app) to see when my friends aren't home and go rob their house. Should every app or device that makes crime easier be banned forever?
When it comes to economic warfare, China is an expert (and knows how to play meely-mouthed pigs like Tim Cook 7 ways from sunday)
Well, I don’t see many multi millionaire celebrities criticizing China about anything at all. That’s what I’m talking about, their public virtue signaling not what they might feel deep inside them.
We all know that in China the Chinese are great copycats and in order to become a great copycat one must have learned from others so them becoming experts in economic warfare means they have learned from others Who imposes sanctions and economic warfare upon others around the world these days? Is it the Chinese? Records at the UN speak for themselves.
Everything { every publicly traded company } does is for the bottom line dollar, { because that is what is mandated by the law} nothing else.
The FBI asking for backdoor access to all iphones isn't even in the same realm. A better example would be if ISIS made an app to let them know the location of US convoys so they could ambush them with IED's. Of course ISIS would say they just want to use it to avoid US convoys for their safety.