Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Which Apple Watch S4 will you get?

  • 40mm

    Votes: 391 29.6%
  • 44mm

    Votes: 932 70.4%

  • Total voters
    1,323

techtechtech

macrumors regular
Nov 9, 2017
153
197
UK
is that just the black nike band? it looks so good in these photos. I got the 40mm watch because I have tiny wrists. So far I haven't found that an issue with the screen being too small and complicaitons.
It is just the standard Nike band, I would say the Series 6 Nike band looks almost graphite colour in certain light. Prefer the Nike band since for me it breathes better than the standard sports version.

I agree regarding screen size, no complaints here, in fact it is a nice step up from the 38mm.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: harrywatson

fulhamx5

macrumors member
Oct 10, 2019
91
9
i'm 6.0 height. but have normal wrists. maybe a little thin
do you think this 44 mm is too large for me?
 

Attachments

  • C1182686-6E4F-4B75-8B38-5B12B2FAD536.png
    C1182686-6E4F-4B75-8B38-5B12B2FAD536.png
    2.8 MB · Views: 582
  • C675ED17-0CAF-477B-92B2-85F5C48F5554.png
    C675ED17-0CAF-477B-92B2-85F5C48F5554.png
    2 MB · Views: 524
  • Like
Reactions: GrandeLatte

Madhatter32

macrumors 65816
Apr 17, 2020
1,457
2,915
Hello everybody, I'm another ~163cm wrist guy who can't decide the size of its first apple watch, can you help me please?
One moment I think the 40mm is better and the other one I change my mind, after that I change my mind again, and so on...
In the photos the blue is 44mm and the red is 40mm


View attachment 966284 View attachment 966285 View attachment 966286 View attachment 966289 View attachment 966290 View attachment 966292 View attachment 966293

View attachment 966287

View attachment 966288

View attachment 966291
My eyes like the 40 mm better on you. Your eyes might enjoy the 44 mm.
 

l33tc0d3r

macrumors newbie
Nov 17, 2020
1
1
Hi all, I have been thinking if I should be getting the 40mm S6. I own a 44mm S4. From where I live I do not have access to try on the Apple watches. Here is a shot of my 44mm S4 on my 170mm wrist (I think my wrist is flatter?). Let me know if 44mm looks too big. Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • F791A20B-33F6-4FBB-A1A2-826CEFAAC686.jpeg
    F791A20B-33F6-4FBB-A1A2-826CEFAAC686.jpeg
    331.6 KB · Views: 405
  • Like
Reactions: schlupps

Ryan1524

macrumors 68020
Apr 9, 2003
2,093
1,422
Canada GTA
Struggling with this decision myself.

And for anyone interested, this is an interesting read if you want to compare traditional watch sizing’s normal diameter vs lug-to-lug size.

Apple watch’s sizing is more comparable to the lug-to-lug size, since it’s the true height/length of the watch.

But one can argue how it fits is very different due to the rectangular shape. Just because you can wear a traditional watch with 48-49mm lug-to-lug doesn’t mean you should wear a 44.

 
Last edited:

EugW

macrumors G5
Jun 18, 2017
14,087
11,850
Hi all, I have been thinking if I should be getting the 40mm S6. I own a 44mm S4. From where I live I do not have access to try on the Apple watches. Here is a shot of my 44mm S4 on my 170mm wrist (I think my wrist is flatter?). Let me know if 44mm looks too big. Thanks!
It looks big to me. If you like it and prefer the larger size because of the larger screen, then that makes perfect sense. However, from a purely aesthetic point of view, it looks oversized. Now, a lot of people prefer the look of oversized these days apparently, so it's up to you. FWIW, I ordered the 40 mm S5 cellular and I have a 172 mm wrist. However, I traditionally preferred smaller and thinner watches (back when I actually wore them) since it's easier and nicer to wear them with all clothing (including long sleeve shirts with cuffs). Furthermore, in terms of screen real estate the 40 mm actually is bigger than the 42 mm. I'll give it a shot and see how I like it over the next while. If I find my aging eyes squinting too much, then perhaps I'll switch to the 44 mm. However, I already have a nice big 12 Pro Max for the main stuff.

BTW, kudos on listing your wrist size. There are way too many posts in here asking if 40 or 44 is better, without much other frame of reference.

P.S. Should the title of the thread be changed now? S4-S6?
 
Last edited:

Polaroid

macrumors 65816
Oct 1, 2013
1,417
1,519
I thought 44mm would be too big (came from 42mm) but tbh I compared it to my partners 42mm and it isn’t that much bigger, I love the 44mm and not sure how I’d manage with 40mm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: YaShiMo

YaShiMo

macrumors regular
Jun 19, 2019
113
67
I originally ordered the 40 mm for my son because I thought that the 44 mm would be too big! After trying on the S/M band with my watch on him, it fit perfectly. Knowing that my son will have the watch for at least two years and grow, the 44 mm became a better choice. Besides, the GizmoGadget he has is already the same size of the 44. The little bit of extra battery life and larger screen size was also apart of the decision!
 
Last edited:

EugW

macrumors G5
Jun 18, 2017
14,087
11,850
I originally ordered the 40 mm for my son because I thought that the 44 mm would be too big! After trying on the S/M band with my watch on him, it fit perfectly. Knowing that my son will have the watch for at least two years and grow, the 44 mm became a better choice. Besides, the GizmoGadget he has is already the same size of the 44. The little bit of extra battery life and larger screen size was also apart of the decision!
Yeah but how big is his wrist?

As mentioned before, Watch size purchase choices don’t really have much meaning for the rest of us if you don’t tell us the wrist size.
 

satchmo

macrumors 603
Aug 6, 2008
5,027
5,707
Canada
This is a 40mm on a 155mm wrist.

By the book it fits, but something about it feels small. Does a small watch accentuate and make my small wrists look smaller?

I do have very flat wrists, and thinking maybe 44mm?
Thoughts?


IMG_5889.jpeg
 

The-Real-Deal82

macrumors P6
Jan 17, 2013
16,551
24,317
Wales, United Kingdom
This is a 40mm on a 155mm wrist.

By the book it fits, but something about it feels small. Does a small watch accentuate and make my small wrists look smaller?

I do have very flat wrists, and thinking maybe 44mm?
Thoughts?


View attachment 1698143

That looks perfect to me to be honest but if your own personal taste is suggesting it’s small then it may be worth trying on a larger watch to see what you think. I have a 40mm and also have flat wrists. I don’t really like big watches personally and like to see a bit of wrist either side of any watch that I wear.
621d6e0cc7f1ffcbe213e74802282e59.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: mgscheue

dmk1974

macrumors 68020
Sep 16, 2008
2,393
464
My wrist is only 184 mm in diameter and I'd be coming from a Fitbit Versa 2 (which I have been happy with). Should I target a 40 mm or 44 mm Apple Watch 6?
 

satchmo

macrumors 603
Aug 6, 2008
5,027
5,707
Canada
That looks perfect to me to be honest but if your own personal taste is suggesting it’s small then it may be worth trying on a larger watch to see what you think. I have a 40mm and also have flat wrists. I don’t really like big watches personally and like to see a bit of wrist either side of any watch that I wear.
621d6e0cc7f1ffcbe213e74802282e59.jpg

Thanks for your feedback. I'm see how nice yours fit (and colour coordinated too!).

I wonder if your watch looks larger because the space grey frame adds to the face size. Whereas a silver frame subtracts and makes the face feel smaller?

Regardless, I probably should try out a 44mm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The-Real-Deal82
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.