Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

puma1552

Suspended
Nov 20, 2008
5,559
1,947
So what makes these unacceptable when I could literally cut the cord off the current EarPods and it would look exactly the same? Is something about having a cord run down your front (or into your shirt) more socially acceptable than without?

Honestly though, I couldn't give less of a **** about what people think about what I wear.

Agreed. I don't get it, they are earbuds without the wire and they look great, far better than all the other ones out there that look like hearing aids. Everyone will have these and they will look perfectly normal soon enough.

Anyway I'm really interested in these. I wouldn't wear $160 headphones at the gym where they will get ruined with sweat, which is the only place a lack of remote controls would be inconvenient. For me I'd use these at my desk at work with my phone out on the desk, so I can just change volume/tracks with the phone controls and that will be fine.

All I ask is that they sound as clear as the wired earbuds (which isn't a high standard, just don't want the sound to be poor/fuzzy/static-y) and I'll be sold. Even better would be if they sound like Apple's $80 in ear headphones, which sound fantastic.

I do think I'll be buying these.
 

matrix07

macrumors G3
Jun 24, 2010
8,226
4,892
That last part...id be on my motorcycle and asking Siri to call someone and she would say I have to unlock the phone first....hated it. Bluetooth in my helmet (sena 10)...

Yep. So annoying. That's because SIRI has no way to know who's holding the phone, unlike the Watch. One clear benefit of being "personal" device.
 

AppleRobert

macrumors 603
Nov 12, 2012
5,726
1,132
Agreed. I don't get it, they are earbuds without the wire and they look great, far better than all the other ones out there that look like hearing aids. Everyone will have these and they will look perfectly normal soon enough.

Anyway I'm really interested in these. I wouldn't wear $160 headphones at the gym where they will get ruined with sweat, which is the only place a lack of remote controls would be inconvenient. For me I'd use these at my desk at work with my phone out on the desk, so I can just change volume/tracks with the phone controls and that will be fine.

All I ask is that they sound as clear as the wired earbuds (which isn't a high standard, just don't want the sound to be poor/fuzzy/static-y) and I'll be sold. Even better would be if they sound like Apple's $80 in ear headphones, which sound fantastic.

I do think I'll be buying these.

The $80 in ear headphones sound great? The last time I read reviews from folks purchasing through Apple did not give me that impression, most were meh.
 

puma1552

Suspended
Nov 20, 2008
5,559
1,947
The $80 in ear headphones sound great? The last time I read reviews from folks purchasing through Apple did not give me that impression, most were meh.

Yes, they do sound great.

I've noticed that most people that say they suck are the same ones that thing Bose is the best thing on the planet...

"No highs, all lows, must be Bose..."
 

AppleRobert

macrumors 603
Nov 12, 2012
5,726
1,132
Yes, they do sound great.

I've noticed that most people that say they suck are the same ones that thing Bose is the best thing on the planet...

"No highs, all lows, must be Bose..."

Well I always steered clear because of rather negative reviews even though they are obviously returnable if I did not like them.

I may give them a go since I have some android smartphones I can use them with.
 

rockyromero

macrumors 6502
Jul 11, 2015
468
147
Any advantage of airpods over bluetooth?

Airpods are computers in your ears.

Commanding Siri and all Apple devices.

Have a thought, speak it and a response comes back to you.

Music is a side feature.

So is people communications.

➰[/QUOTE]
 

xAnthony

macrumors 65816
Mar 2, 2010
1,174
143
I was hoping the product would have been completely re-designed. I have problems with the Apple earbuds staying in my ears... Especially while running. Once I start sweating, I might as well just take them out. They don't stay at all. I have a pair of UrBeats ($100) and they're amazing. Sound quality is way better than the Apple earbuds and I don't have any issues with them falling out of my ears.

I would be expecting a pretty amazing sound experience for $160. I don't believe these Airpods are going to meet those expectations.
 

bhayes444

macrumors 6502a
Jul 13, 2013
772
292
I was hoping the product would have been completely re-designed. I have problems with the Apple earbuds staying in my ears... Especially while running. Once I start sweating, I might as well just take them out. They don't stay at all. I have a pair of UrBeats ($100) and they're amazing. Sound quality is way better than the Apple earbuds and I don't have any issues with them falling out of my ears.

I would be expecting a pretty amazing sound experience for $160. I don't believe these Airpods are going to meet those expectations.
They probably won't meet the expectations you have for them. For $160 you aren't paying for the sound experience, but the wireless experience they offer. Most of the price is going towards their wireless capabilities, and the rest towards their sound. They most likely won't sound better than $100 earphones, but maybe they will sound similar to $50-60 earphones.
 

matrix07

macrumors G3
Jun 24, 2010
8,226
4,892
All I ask is that they sound as clear as the wired earbuds (which isn't a high standard, just don't want the sound to be poor/fuzzy/static-y) and I'll be sold. Even better would be if they sound like Apple's $80 in ear headphones, which sound fantastic.


If that's your only criteria, don't think you have any risk there. Also, when you have Apple Watch you can put iPhone anywhere you want.
[doublepost=1473652382][/doublepost]
I was hoping the product would have been completely re-designed. I have problems with the Apple earbuds staying in my ears... Especially while running. Once I start sweating, I might as well just take them out. They don't stay at all. I have a pair of UrBeats ($100) and they're amazing. Sound quality is way better than the Apple earbuds and I don't have any issues with them falling out of my ears.

I would be expecting a pretty amazing sound experience for $160. I don't believe these Airpods are going to meet those expectations.

It was not designed for running. You should consider the new Beat for that.
 

xAnthony

macrumors 65816
Mar 2, 2010
1,174
143
They probably won't meet the expectations you have for them. For $160 you aren't paying for the sound experience, but the wireless experience they offer. Most of the price is going towards their wireless capabilities, and the rest towards their sound. They most likely won't sound better than $100 earphones, but maybe they will sound similar to $50-60 earphones.

I would just like to correct myself. I thought the price was $160. I just checked the Apple Store and they're selling at $219 CAD. I'm not going to lie, I laughed out loud... I'm curious to see if people would actually spend $247 CAD (after tax) on these...
 

matrix07

macrumors G3
Jun 24, 2010
8,226
4,892
I would just like to correct myself. I thought the price was $160. I just checked the Apple Store and they're selling at $219 CAD. I'm not going to lie, I laughed out loud... I'm curious to see if people would actually spend $247 CAD (after tax) on these...

How many for Samsung Gear Icon X I'm curious? It's 199 in USD.
 

Kevsta26

macrumors 6502a
Apr 2, 2011
677
295
USA
How many for Samsung Gear Icon X I'm curious? It's 199 in USD.

Doing the math, the Icon X could cost up to exactly $299 CAD after tax depending on where you live in Canada. That translates to $229 USD after a sales tax of 15%
 

objektør

macrumors 6502
Nov 25, 2014
273
24
At home
I really don't like all those 'in ear buds'. May be you don't loose them so easily but I find them very uncomfortable.
Apple earbuds and probably the airpods fit me well. With some cheap silicon tips they might fit even better but wonder if they still fit in the battery case with those tips.
 

sactownbwoy

macrumors 6502
Aug 28, 2008
301
192
If they were a different design I would get them. But since they are the same as the wired ones and those hurt my ears after about ten minutes of being in my ear, I'll pass. I like the technology behind them but the design is garbage for me. I've got a mix of Bluetooth and wired headphones and I listen to talk radio 99% of the time so or me audio quality is meaningless.
[doublepost=1473716712][/doublepost]
Here we go again...

Apple changes design, releases a new product. Everyone jumps on the hatewagon. People feel disappointed, pissed, and cheated. Time passes. Next thing you know, people begin to like it. Then they love it and can't live without it. It becomes the standard.

I get it. There are advantages to having wired EarPods. There are also many disadvantages. I, for one, hate the wires with a passion. Every time I have to take out the EarPods from my bag or pocket, I am ready to kill someone out of frustration. Untangling these things is a nightmare. Generally speaking, I find them irritating as f***. It is by far the most annoying accessory that I deal with on a daily basis.

Sure, the wireless AirPods may look "funny" and "ugly" to some at first glance, but that's because you're not used to them. It was no different from initially seeing people talk on an iPad (***cough cough*** I meant iPhone 6 Plus ***cough cough***). It looked idiotic, at best, because the size was "ridiculous".

Except they didn't change the design. The only difference between these and the wired ones, is the wire. They are white, and have that same odd shape that hurts my ears. Others may like them but for me the design is not comfortable.
 

Fuchal

macrumors 68030
Sep 30, 2003
2,607
1,086
I love everything about these AirPods except the design and lack of color choices. I'm curious about this W1 processor and if it decodes AAC on the AirPods or the iPhone. The AirPod website says they "provide rich, high-quality AAC audio." If they do decode AAC, that would be pretty cool for wireless headphones.

AAC is one of the available codecs for bluetooth audio, along with SBC and APTX.
 

Perene

macrumors 6502a
Jun 29, 2015
835
321
Netherealm
I'll consider buying, because I only use the iPad and while I am home. The regular headphone doesn't fall from my ears.

However, the biggest drawback for me is that I always loved doing these with the EarPod's built-in remote: fluctuating the volume levels (sometimes the music is too loud, or you might want to increase the volume in a specific moment) and pausing/returning the playback, and we can't do both with a wireless headphone. Sure we can do these in the iPad itself, but it's not the same for me. If at least I could still do this wireless, too, it would be great. Sort of like a feeling you have a wireless joystick.
 
Last edited:

sactownbwoy

macrumors 6502
Aug 28, 2008
301
192
But you can manually go back and turn Bluetooth on. I do it all the time. Just hitting airplane mode will shut off all the radios but after you turn on airplane mode you can manually turn on Bluetooth or wireless if you so desire.
 

bhayes444

macrumors 6502a
Jul 13, 2013
772
292
I'll consider buying, because I only use the iPad and while I am home. The regular headphone doesn't fall from my ears.

However, the biggest drawback for me is that I always loved doing these with the EarPod's built-in remote: fluctuating the volume levels (sometimes the music is too loud, or you might want to increase the volume in a specific moment) and pausing/returning the playback, and we can't do both with a wireless headphone. Sure we can do these in the iPad itself, but it's not the same for me. If at least I could still do this wireless, too, it would be great. Sort of like a feeling you have a wireless joystick.
From what I've seen there won't be a way to change the volume with the headphones aside from Siri. Unless Apple pushes out an update that lets you tap both simultaneously to change volume, I wouldn't count on it with this generation. Even tapping both simultaneously wouldn't fly though, as people using just one airpod wouldn't be able to use the functionality.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.