"Hi, I'm gonna buy the new Apple Watch Ultra due to the fact it gets 2 to 3+ days full battery use, then limit it's charging to 80% because reasons."
Here’s some proof that never (virtually never) charging to 100% will let the battery outlast the useful life of the iPhone.
I have an 8 year old iPhone 6 Plus with its original battery that ios 12 battery health says is still at 99%. (Which doesn’t seem possible). The battery was almost never charged to 100% in 8 years. Usually it was charged only to 75-80%. Almost never discharged below 40%.
Coconut Battery says its at 93%, so its still got a lot of life left in it.
The iPhone 6 is pretty much unusable nowadays even on ios 12 - because its so dang slow, (was kinda slow on ios 9, and really slow on ios 12) so basically the battery had outlived the useful life of the phone.
Nowadays its very easy to have the charger automatically turn off at whatever charge level you set using the Shortcuts app and a HomeKit compatible smart plug.
Right, I'm all for features, I'm just wondering why you would want to use this when it doesn't seem like it would benefit you. If you only use 20-30% of your battery on any given day, why do you need to keep it from degrading a few percent a year?
Not trying to change your mind, I'm just curious why.
What's the point ?Just like the Ultra where you can set to only charge to 80% and not 100% unless you wish.
I only use about 20-30% of my battery everyday and do not need my battery pushed to 100% every day.
Samsung provides that option on their devices, so I assume it does make some sense.The difference this would make for battery life is minuscule.
Plus, Apple already does the charging management thing where it slows significantly when you get above 80%.
It has nothing to do with smarter, it's just a trade-off. There is no free lunch. Want to fast-charge or charge to 100% or charge wirelessly? You'll pay for it in battery life. That's just physics. It won't make much difference if you keep your phone only for 2 years, though, and if you keep it longer, you can also change the battery. They would't need a battery-changing service if their phones were designed for battery longevity alone.I don't get how people think that they are smarter than Apple engineers who are responsible for designing and producing millions of phones every single year.
I'd assume that it prefers to do that at night, so if you charge over night and get up at around the same time every day, it should work regardless of your charging over the rest of the day. I usually get up between 6:00 and 11:00, depending on work requirements - I guess, it wouldn't work in my case.Optimised charging is only good for those who have a charging routine - those who leave their phones to charge overnight for instance, since the handset can 'learn' your charging routine and push to that 100% mark before you usually remove from charge.
The point is some might want to. Why not?What's the point ?
Make the phone battery last a few years longer than normal users charging to 100% ?
Why shortchange yourself ?
Do you fill your gas tank to 80% ?
I don't bother = fill up and charge everything I own to 100%.
My 6 year old XS Max still has 92% capacity after many years.
My 4 year old PHEV gets charged 100% every day and still has 95% capacity.
My EV Truck gets charged 100% and 100% capacity.
View attachment 2094974
I don't get how people think that they are smarter than Apple engineers who are responsible for designing and producing millions of phones every single year.
its not a Samsung, the phone will last way longer than the batteryNot exactly what the OP meant. The OP stated that he/she only uses about 20-30% battery daily anyway, so either way, the OP does enjoy the phone as is. But if this feature was available, OP’s phone might have better battery longevity in its second and third year due to reduced time charging in 100%.
It wouldn't make ANY difference to them because they operate their phones as if the battery is shot to pieces anyway.It is mainly for other who do care about their battery and phone are so expensive they can not afford a new one every year or even every 2-3 years. It would make a difference to them. I get a new phone every year so . . . . .
I am curious why people are against giving people the option to use this. I am not trying to force it on everyone but the option was given on the Ultra, why not the iPhone. This really seems to be upsetting many here, but there are many who would like this. Does not matter as Apple will not be doing it anyway.
It was to mess with the battery OCD guys.why did Apple give us this option on the Ultra? Evidently the Apple engineers thought there was merit there so why not the iPhone.?
I am not trying to force it on everyone but the option was given on the Ultra, why not the iPhone.
Just like the Ultra where you can set to only charge to 80% and not 100% unless you wish.
MacRumors said:All Apple Watch models running watchOS 7 or later [...]
Because some people with the Apple Watch Ultra will just have it as a second, third or maybe fourth watch.If that's the case, why Apple put that feature for the Apple Watch Ultra?
Okay… Deep, slow breath.
About Optimized Battery Charging on your iPhone - Apple Support
In iOS 13, your iPhone learns from your daily charging habits to improve the lifespan of your battery.support.apple.com
Happy now?
I agree, bet we will see it before the 14 arrives. I hope some of the posters can stand it!I
It was to mess with the battery OCD guys.
Seriously I would imagine it's because Samsung and some of the other manufacturers are now offering these battery settings. Expect it in iOS soon.
OP, you say you only use 20-30% a day. That means you’re already at 70-80% when you’re done for the day. Perhaps just don’t charge it. Same difference minus a little standby drain.
Or charge during the day instead of night so you can keep an eye on the level.