Yay!
Is it still going to cost more than a new car?
It’s symbolic to China that the USA can influence one the wealthiest companies in the world to not manufacture an item in China.
You do know???
Please cite a credible source, with a link, on that earning less than $2 per 12 hour day.
Is it still going to cost more than a new car?
Yes. But less than child support.Is it still going to cost more than a new car?
Probably, going to cost quite a bit. Not made for people like you that can’t afford it.Is it still going to cost more than a new car?
More demand for an existing labor supply raises the price (wages) of said labor. Assuming you took Econ 101 recently, maybe they’re teaching it in Econ 102 right now. Either that or they’re no longer teaching conventional basic Econ which would help explain why so many recent college graduates now believe socialism works.Why? If it could be made in China for cheaper and the US is at full employment?
It's Econ 101.
Tariffs are based on imported cost manufacture and do not proportionately increase the retail price. The imported cost of manufacture is less than 40% of the retail price, hence, a 25% tariffs would only result necessarily in a 10% increase in the retail price. Assuming sales quantity is unaffected by a 10% increase, gross margins to Apple would be uneffected.Except the iPhone X was an actual improvement. I don't want to pay a $350 tax to the US government on my iPhone just because it was assembled in China, thanks.
An interesting analysis. Question though. Why would you care whether anyone that can afford a luxury product like a Mac Pro is paying more in taxes to own said luxury item. Aren’t they definitionally rich and shouldn’t they definitionally be expected to pay more tax in order to pay their fair share?I don’t think this bodes well for the success of the new Mac Pro. I don’t see anything in the article that says this is the best choice for the Mac or its customers, only that it satisfies a political objective. The problems with making the 2013 model in the US are well documented, now more than twice as much of this machine is being made in the US and we’re not getting quotes about lower costs or improved reliability, but instead about a handful of jobs that are most likely just being taken from another manufacturer.
I have a bad feeling that Apple needed to sacrifice a product line on the political altar as they offer thanks to the Administration for not smiting them and pray for the fertility of their crop of iPhones-- and the MP is what they chose. The White House will get a tweet out of this, Apple might get the President’s ear for a meeting or two on additional tariff exemptions, and we get a compromised workstation.
I’m curious on your take as to how we managed to produce anything in the US before the late 60s using materials from within the US that has to be imported given that we didn’t import much, if not all, of it then?Oh I just interpreting this article. If the tariffs had been in place then this part would have been produced outside the US, without the tariff it is being produced in the US. So by that logic the tariff is encouraging manufacture outside of the US.
Working in a competitive manufacturing industry we manufacture 100% in the US. We have to import materials as the US is not a big enough source of these parts. We get hit very heavily by these tariffs and it is effecting our margins. All of our major competitors manufacture outside of the US (Mexico) using the same imported raw material we do. When they import the finished item from Mexico they don't pay the same level of tariff that we do. At the end of the day we're being hit because we manufacture in the US.
The Chinese already have a rather beautiful 1000 year old wall, so big that it can be seen from earth orbit. That said, almost all of our existing wall was built well before the current administration took office with funding that was happily provided by both parties. In fact, it used to be that Democrats were very motivated to find build walls on the southern borders in the early 2010s when they still worried more about protecting US citizens than illegal aliens. You see, they realized then that controlling low skilled immigration meant more jobs and higher low skilled wages for all Americans, including people of color.And the Chinese government greatly subsidized developing that infrastructure. The US government is building an expensive and unnecessary wall.
View attachment 862681
The Mac Pro is so expensive!!!!!!!!!
I thought the original Mac was overpriced. Didn’t Steve Jobs want the price to be lower but Sculley overruled him?View attachment 862681
The Mac Pro is so expensive!!!!!!!!!
Luxury item? I thought it was for getting work done.An interesting analysis. Question though. Why would you care whether anyone that can afford a luxury product like a Mac Pro is paying more in taxes to own said luxury item. Aren’t they definitionally rich and shouldn’t they definitionally be expected to pay more tax in order to pay their fair share?
Honestly, I had forgotten about this Mac Pro. Way out of my budget (like by 100x), but it will be fun to watch where this goes...
There isn't a long-term plan to move manufacturing to the US. The US is much better at designing these products and writing the software that runs on them, which is far more valuable. It is a mystery why we are so obsessed with wanting low-skilled, low-paid manufacturing jobs back with horrible working conditions.
Yep, like leg warmers and "mall hair!"...A lot of people forget how much stuff cost in the 80's, but we bought them any way...
Yes! The last President scared EVERYBODY away, and then told us he was just there to "manage the decline" and that we should get used to the idea that no jobs would be the "new normal". We deserve better than that, and we deserve a better President than the last four we had.For not scaring away companies already manufacturing in the US?
And there's one other thing too. The more people we have working, the more empowered people we have in the country. We deserve that level of dignity too.new jobs for Americans is significant for the individuals working, and it does infact reflect on the unemployment rate.