Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Store in Maryland Makes History by Voting to Unionize
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Here's an updated one from 2013.
In this labor market? It's not like Tim Cook can just order the Air Force and the National Guard to scab at the Apple Store.
“The current welfare system provides such a high level of benefits that it acts as a disincentive for work. Welfare currently pays more than a minimum‐wage job in 35 states, even after accounting for the Earned Income Tax Credit, and in 13 states it pays more than $15 per hour. If Congress and state legislatures are serious about reducing welfare dependence and rewarding work, they should consider strengthening welfare work requirements, removing exemptions, and narrowing the definition of work. Moreover, states should consider ways to shrink the gap between the value of welfare and work by reducing current benefit levels and tightening eligibility requirements.”
So the solution to whatever you perceive the problem to be is to the lower benefit value to less than minimum wage, which itself can’t cover cost of living anywhere. Late stage capitalism is just as dystopian as communism.
I agree with Powell in his assessment that the labor market is "unsustainably hot".
Powell Says U.S. Labor Market Is 'Unsustainably Hot'
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell says the U.S. labor market is "too hot," but "very, very good" for workers. He speaks during an IMF-hosted panel in Washington. (Source: Bloomberg)
www.bloomberg.com
And companies have already started to announce hiring freezes.
Hiring freezes and layoffs are happening everywhere. Here's what you should do next if your company hits pause on hires.
Hiring freezes can make employees feel powerless and nervous about potential layoffs. Here's what to do if your company puts the brakes on hires.
Did that actually happen? Because a lot of right wingers *said* it happened but they do that no matter what
For a good view of what that cesspool was like read The Jungle or Midnight is a Place. The crunch mode (time) programers go through is a 21st century sweatshop produced mainly because some Pointy Haired Boss got a bee in their bonnet about some 'so cool we must have' feature or had to meet some arbitrary must ship by date. More over it does not work because at best you burn out your programmers and ship a buggy mess.
No one is forcing anyone to work at Apple. Each employee is worth exactly what they are willing to accept in exchange for that work. If that person thinks that they deserve to earn more, then it’s on them to ask for it or perhaps hopefully the company will recognize the contribution and pay that person more. But, the company, no matter how rich they are, is under no obligation to pay their employees a dividend of their profits. Again, you are only worth what you are willing to accept. Unions unravel this scenario by forcing the company to not treat employees as individuals, but rather as groups with the middle-man union bosses dictating benefits with threats. It sets up a hostile working environment between all those involved. Eventually the demands of the unions undermine the profitability of the company as a whole and then it’s just a matter of time before it all falls apart.
You are only worth what you are willing to accept in exchange for your work. That’s all you are worth no matter how rich the company you work for is. Feel free to start up your own company and pay your employees as a whole an equal dividend of your profit. Good luck!
That’s a ridiculously one-sided view how things work.
When business grow and merge and consolidate to eliminate competition for jobs, we call them clever. When workers do the same thing, we call them greedy.
Walmart comes to town and eliminates dozens of business that compete for workers. Without competition, the free market doesn’t work. Walmart can now just say take it or leave it.
You’re welcome to start your own company and pay your employees what they think they deserve. Good luck!
Likewise you are welcome NOT to start your own company and become a "smart" employee who knows how to be "indispensable" and only accept a big paycheck from the employer.
I don't think you understand how the power game is being played.
"Going an extra mile" is not necessary going to make you indispensable. But it can definitely make you a "good loser".
It won’t be you negotiating anything. It will be union bosses, who you will be paying, who will also be taking a cut of what they force the company to give to you. There is always an underlying hatred among all involved whenever a union is in place in a company. It will make Apple rot from within. Large scale unions within Apple will mark the downward turn for them.
The only reason a union gets formed is if the employees are treated like garbage to begin with. The only one who hates a union is overly greedy management. That is why computer game companies are so afraid of unions - the conditions many games are made are the 21st century version of The Jungle or Midnight is a Place. Want to cut costs? Get rid of all those MBAs whose practical business knowledge is rising to zero (my late mother called that degree Moron of Business Administration for a reason) and odds are one will have more than enough money to pay for the wage increases.
Nintendo did (Satoru Iwata, then CEO of Nintendo, took a 50% pay cut because his company was losing money at that time).
Last edited:
Yup. There's no chance that employees just want more and more even those who are already very well compensated.
Nintendo did.
What did this Japanese company do?
When Apple was on the brink of extinction, did the employees volunteer to give back the money they earned from Apple in the past?
Read the original comment this was in reply to - "If/when companies loses money, will they volunteer to take pay cuts?" Satoru Iwata (then CEO of Nintendo) took a 50% pay cut ergo Nintendo (or at lease the CEO) volunteered to take a pay cut because his company was losing money at that time.
Show me one company where the rank and file employees 'gave back the money they earned' (which is not the same as a pay cut as they already paid tax on the money).
Last edited:
You're goalpost moving to salvage a poorly thought out premise. Why should the lower employees take a pay cut/send money back when the biggest single money drain is those higher up the pay scale or a host of middle men that when you really sit down the company does not need?
Last edited:
They shouldn't. Just like how they shouldn't expect more pay if/when the companies do well.