Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
France Orders End to iPhone 12 Sales Over Radiation Level Concerns
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Asked and answered several times in this thread already.
Last edited:
People should be thankful that there are EU institutions holding companies accountable to comply with regulations. Yesterday Apple was touting the switch to USB C as some magical idea they came up with when in reality they have to comply with the new EU regulations that will come into effect next year.
You get more actual ionizing radiation (the kind that actually damages) from a banana.Good for France and the EU!
Glad to see some governments and regulators are now taking this threat seriously. One thing we've learned over the decades is that government safety thresholds are typically set too high — often due to lobbying by corporate interests — and, over time, as scientists discover that there are cancerous effects at even lower levels, the thresholds are reduced.
In other words, just because a cell phone's radiation is less than a current threshold doesn’t mean it's safe. In this case, they've found the iPhone 12's radiation is higher than a likely too high standard. That's concerning.
I took a gander at the WHO site linked to in the article — and its supposedly glowing, cell phones are safe conclusion. Major problems.
1. The report is from 2014! It's nearly a decade old—quite outdated.
2. One of the top key facts highlighted — in bold — at the top of the report was this:
So, even back then, there was a recognition that negative health effects were an issue.
- “The electromagnetic fields produced by mobile phones are classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer as possibly carcinogenic to humans.”
3. WHO planned a follow-up report for 2016. Where is that and why wasn't it the one being reported on?
4. The CDC reports
”Some organizations recommend caution in cell phone use. More research is needed before we know if using cell phones causes health effects.”
CDC - Radiation: FAQs about Cell Phones and Your Health
Frequently asked questions about cell phones and your health. Provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.www.cdc.gov
5. Some public health experts are warning of the dangers.
See Moskowitz: Cellphone radiation is harmful, but few want to believe it
Moskowitz: Cellphone radiation is harmful, but few want to believe it
The vast majority of American adults — 97% — own a cellphone of some kind, according to the Pew Research Center . (Photo by Susanne Nilsson via Flickr) For more than a decade, Joel Moskowitz , a researcher in the School of Public Health at UC Berkeley ...news.berkeley.edu
6. In the U.S., it's not the FDA that sets the radiation levels or limits but the incredibly politicized FCC.
In 2020, the FDA reported favorably yet with the usual hedges:
“To date, there is no consistent or credible scientific evidence of health problems caused by the exposure to radio frequency energy emitted by cell phones (see Review of Published Literature between 2008 and 2018 of Relevance to Radiofrequency Radiation and Cancer)”
That, too, however, is based on outdated research — 2008-2018.
Cell phone use has skyrocketed in recent years — with people spending more hours with them — meaning the radiation impact is now more severe and not captured by older studies. We also know that cancerous effects can take decades to manifest themselves.
Thus, it is far too early to be dismissive of the potentially serious effects of cellphone use or to take a head-in-the-sand Alfred E. Neuman stance on this,
”What, Me Worry?”
I think we need to stop using the term “radiation” because people can’t tell the difference between radioactivity and EM fields.
You would think Apple is aware of this and would make sure any updates to the modem wouldn’t increase emissions to go above the limit.
It’s the same garbage nonsense that have people thinking microwaves are irradiating them.
That's illogical. It's not like you immediately see the effects of minor (but harmful) levels of radiation.
France says the radiation exceeds safe levels. Do you have evidence to contradict that?
iPhone & all of apples products have always had dangerous radiation leveles that cause reproductive issues & cancers. They just don’t care
Facts! Cellphone radiation ☢️ like microwaves are both Extremely Dangerous &&& should not be used in consumer products.
There's a lot of misinformation out there, people panicking about 5-6 watts of radiation, when there's a lot more radiation already in the air. Some people should start by cleaning the door and seals of their microwave ovens. That's a great risk that's being ignored nowadays. Or maybe they don't have microwave ovens...
There are bigger health risks out there: Pollution, UV Radiation, Fecal contaminants in water sources and the beach, etc... Driving on the highway or going to the mall, work or school are also big risks.
That Mother Nature really had an attitude... if she is for real, we could consider ourselves already doomed!
Actually the limit is 4 per TFA, so a little less than 50%. I suspect if it went up over time a software fix may be likely.
The French are using a dumb method for measuring radiation. There's more radiation coming out of our grandmother's television.
Maybe it was a feature. You can also use your iPhone 12 as a microwave to warm your ears 😂
Nonsense. As I recall, Apple pointed out that USB-C had emerged as a common standard, not that they invented it. I don't know where you got that idea from.
As an ex 12 years experience test operator, repair tech and test engineer for a major mobile manufacturer back in the 90's I have personal first hand experience of mobile phone radiation and it is real and it does affect people, I've seen it happen to employees who tested mobile phones 5 days a week for years, testing anywhere from 30 to 50 units a day, full on two way comms test at full power. Regardless of what the so called science says or how ever it is put forward it will never change my view.
France did not say this. They said that the radiation exceeds set levels. The set levels are such that radiation at or near this amount does not constitute any realistic risk to health.