There are countless situations where a user would not want to share a copy of a photo, document, or other file. Should I share a photo of my spouse or child with the retail clerk just because I want to buy the hat they’re wearing in a photo?
But you are fine doing that with a phone?
Quickly crop the image down to show only the hat?
Else, if you don't want the retail clerk to see photos of your spouse or child at all, don't show it... on Vpro, on iPhone, on iPad, etc.
Your original scenario had you seeing this big problem of WANTING to show a photo to someone else but Vpro would block that. I've offered many ways to do what you originally wanted to do. Vpro is not adding some "loss of control" to the equation. A Vpro owner can show or not show any photos they like. Vpro owners will probably have to have an iPhone too (for cellular signals), so they can share on their iPhone screen as they do now by pulling out their iPhone and showing or not showing a photo.
Most people would not feel comfortable with someone holding a iPhone at eye level, rear cameras facing forward, while entering a washroom. The same would apply to someone wearing a headset with cameras.
Someone trying to capture shots of someone else taking a pee are not going to EVER be so obvious. I don't expect them to walk into the washroom with a full size motion picture camera and crew either. If someone is that type, they'll probably use one of those micro-cameras like the example I showed in the prior post. They may even NOT walk in to do the deed but strategically plant the camera for a few hours and then go and retrieve the images/video later.
Vpro will be far too obvious for such people. If I own Vpro and need to use a restroom, I'm not walking in with it on my head. I put it in the MB-like bag.
If this worry is real, Vpro being obvious, big & bulky would at least let you see the potential invasion coming so you can hide "the prize." On the other hand, those micro "spy cam" cameras could be nearly invisible with NO ONE coming into the restroom at all to still capture their target. That's what that type of deviant would use to get such photos/videos.
This debate we have here strongly indicates there is no chance a headset would replace a smartphone any time soon, at least in the next 5-10 years. There are many social barriers that exist. In my opinion, that is why foldables will be the next evolution for iPhone rather than a headset.
Perhaps. Again, telephony is just an app. I don't own iPhone myself. Instead, I use iPad Mini to ALSO cover my phone and texting needs (VOIP app + buds). In a manner of speaking, I already have a permanently unfolded "iPhone" to fully cover that base for me.
I agree that an Apple Fold or Roll will follow. However, if Vpro or a future MB comes with cellular antennas, they too could stand in as iPhone... as it's only a VOIP app need after that. I have used PowerBook G4s as phones/texting devices as far back as the early 2000's. Their only limitation as a "phone" was no cell signal- wifi only.
IMO, iPhone (profit) is too important to Apple to self-cannibalize it. So my guess is Vpro will depend on iPhone for cellular signals... those Vpro owners will likely need both to do the AR side of things when out and about. If so, Vpro does not replace iPhone at all... just basically becomes an iPhone-dependent device (like Watch or CarPlay) for our heads.
Bottom line: I foresee NO scenario where iPhone goes extinct and Vpro takes over. Instead, Apple Inc would rather sell everyone BOTH even if Vpro comes with cellular capabilities. While the latter makes sense- especially for AR usage scenarios- I suspect exactly like on iPad Cellular devices, Apple will NOT include the iPhone VOIP app, nor select features that require an iPhone to try to motivate BOTH purchases instead of only one... exactly as they do now. The very iPhone-like, iPad Mini cellular can't do a handful of things that iPhone can do because Apple chooses not to let it. I suspect this will be no different.