Not too hard to understand. Building and shipping an iPhone is more damaging for the environment than you charging it for 10 years in a row.
Maybe we should all stop buying iPhones if they care so much about the carbon footprint all in a sudden.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
iOS 16.1 Beta Adds Clean Energy Charging Option to iPhone
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Maybe we should all stop buying iPhones if they care so much about the carbon footprint all in a sudden.
With over a billion purchased iPhones, this is not unnoticeable. To avoid the inevitable, it will take each and everyone of us to make a change. It's very obvious that we are destroying our planet. all these small steps taken by each and everyone of us will make a huge difference. Let's not ignore it.
Last edited:
When i charge the battery icon turns green, wasn’t it always clean? 😱
So let me get this straight. You're saying that you can sign up for solar generation, but once the sun goes down your electricity goes away because that's the only source you signed up for? Or are you saying that you are served by a single power plant, and if it needs maintenance then you lose electricity for however long that maintenance takes (potentially weeks)?
Using multiple power generation sources, yes each potentially using a different method of generating that power, has been part of power grids for GENERATIONS now. And no, this is not just a thing in the US. Why do you think Germany is considering delaying/scrapping their plans to retire multiple nuclear power plants with the Ukraine war going on and Russia cutting off their natural gas supply? It's because they use multiple methods of generating electricity, despite having some of the highest adoption of renewable energy in the world.
Source: My father was plant manager for multiple power plants while I was growing up. These included coal, natural gas, and hydro power. And ALL of these power plants served a single mid-sized city in the western US.
Edit to add: Or perhaps you meant that your power grid only uses a single resource for its entire power generation. That must be one small grid. Either that or you're claiming that every single power plant in a place such as Europe all use the exact same resource for their electrical generation, since every power generation source in Europe is connected to the synchronous grid of Continental Europe.
Last edited:
Nice strawman. We should stop buying iPhones. What about the remainder of the items including food and clothing and consumer oriented electronic devices, or is it only apple that is responsible for the environment? Maybe we should shut down hospitals also, I’m sure they are responsible for much of what you accuse apple of.
Would love to see a meme of a guy charging his iPhone out of a wall socket inside a coal-fired power plant, while it’s showing him “green charging” 🤣
[sarcasm mode on]
Apple has added a hidden sensor that detects if the electricity from the socket smells green, grey or dirty.
[sarcasm mode off]
Coincidentally, Gavin Newsom has just mandated no iPhone charging between 4-9pm. Now that’s clean!
This is one of those things that makes perfect sense if you’ve never left California.
Even in California, the energy used by people charging their phones is probably one of the smallest uses of energy in the state.
Agree this was a waste of time to engineer. If they care this much they should just sell a solar charging kit.
Even in California, the energy used by people charging their phones is probably one of the smallest uses of energy in the state.
Agree this was a waste of time to engineer. If they care this much they should just sell a solar charging kit.
Enough users are full of hot air, that this should work great.
Who are you? I just checked out "your website" (registered 9/2/22) and "your twitter" (joined 9/2022) but everything looks suspiciously fake. Almost like you're not even real at all. Looks like someone is just building up an online persona for the future.. and for what, I really don't know. Interesting....
Oh yes! Great! Just like poop in the pond but keep the water glass clean..
If I buy a pair of jeans they don’t tell me to wash them only off peak hours. Yet.
Apple plays it that way. We should play back!! Wake up folks
Greenwashing at its new peak essentially.
Wth is the meaning of this feature? How on earth would apple figure out which part of the energy is “clean”? Not to mention those “clean” energy sources may not be built cleanly to begin with.
This must have something else to do with matter and HomeKit and whatnot. Maybe there will be “smart” solar stations down the line to let those home owners managing their power generation somehow to get lower carbon footprint. For majority of people who doesn’t get bothered with solar panels and whatnot, it is a placebo toggle at best.
Wth is the meaning of this feature? How on earth would apple figure out which part of the energy is “clean”? Not to mention those “clean” energy sources may not be built cleanly to begin with.
This must have something else to do with matter and HomeKit and whatnot. Maybe there will be “smart” solar stations down the line to let those home owners managing their power generation somehow to get lower carbon footprint. For majority of people who doesn’t get bothered with solar panels and whatnot, it is a placebo toggle at best.
Apple isn’t the only one that does peak non-peak. Power companies have smart meters and plans around peak and non-peak.
If you’re so inclined then ramp up your energy usage during off-peak hours. You’ll do the grid a favor.
Ahem, big offenders can easily wipe off the effort of 200 million people By doing things a little bit more in the wrong direction. If anything, changing release schedule of iPhone from 12 months to 18 months will have a far greater impact to the environment than everyone recharging their phone using renewable sources.
Yeah. While we are at it, charge the iPhone in a coal mine or near a portable petrol generator. That’ll be absolutely “green energy” lmao.
Solar Power Bank, YELOMIN 20000mAh Portable Outdoor Solar Charger, Camping Waterproof Backup Battery Pack with Dual USB 5V Outputs/LED Flashlights and Compass for Cellphones, Perfect for Hiking Travel
Solar Power Bank, YELOMIN 20000mAh Portable Outdoor Solar Charger, Camping Waterproof Backup Battery Pack with Dual USB 5V Outputs/LED Flashlights and Compass for Cellphones, Perfect for Hiking Travel
www.amazon.com
Citation or your opinion.
Solar Power Bank, YELOMIN 20000mAh Portable Outdoor Solar Charger, Camping Waterproof Backup Battery Pack with Dual USB 5V Outputs/LED Flashlights and Compass for Cellphones, Perfect for Hiking Travel
Solar Power Bank, YELOMIN 20000mAh Portable Outdoor Solar Charger, Camping Waterproof Backup Battery Pack with Dual USB 5V Outputs/LED Flashlights and Compass for Cellphones, Perfect for Hiking Travel
www.amazon.com
Although I understand what you're saying and I would agree that ideally changing to a release cycle of 18 months or more would be very advantageous (👍) we shouldn't use that as an argument not to make even these small changes. No matter how small the change, it will grow to make a difference if only everyone played their part.
Yes, it’s a collective effort by “everyone”, you, me, other members, and more importantly, Apple, Google, Microsoft, Samsung, real estate builders, and more. Our tiny effort of charging our phone “greenly” may never reach the critical mass it requires to even Slow down the global warming. I’m not saying we shouldn’t do anything. I’m saying those companies (and a certain country) have to play their part a lot more, faster, and harder. Unless, they want the world be destroyed and no one alive can enjoy their services and products.
I disagree. Not doing anything does nothing. Adding these small extras, even if they are only tiny is better than doing nothing at all.