I can't get to that second one.
By the way here is the chat that I had with Trent.
Hmm....oops I just gave away my actual name! Oh well.
By the way here is the chat that I had with Trent.
Hmm....oops I just gave away my actual name! Oh well.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Panther Screenshots?
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Re: Proven fake
Damn, apple legal took them down. Here they come:
Originally posted by zigzag
Here's proof that they are both fake screenshots:
http://www.spymac.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=26994
http://www.spymac.com/gallery/showphoto.php?photo=26990
Damn, apple legal took them down. Here they come:
Attachments
proven fake
conclusion:
These screenshots are very easy to fake... it is hard to find mistakes because it shows almost nothing that is not already in 10.2. Too bad the author forgot that 10.3 is a maor new version and such a version will need new features to sell. Not to mention that the OS X UI itsef needs much work, none of which is visibly being done here.
This image is definetly guaranteed fake.
conclusion:
These screenshots are very easy to fake... it is hard to find mistakes because it shows almost nothing that is not already in 10.2. Too bad the author forgot that 10.3 is a maor new version and such a version will need new features to sell. Not to mention that the OS X UI itsef needs much work, none of which is visibly being done here.
This image is definetly guaranteed fake.
I had thought that too, "why is it a bit darker," but then I figured that it could have been changed to speed up the download process.
Making the file a quick .jpg download in ImageReady wouldn't change the overall color, unless it was saved as a .gif file first. As a .gif, you have the ability to get the file to have a selective color table.
Is it too much trouble for a few files? Perhaps. And maybe it is also just a janitor's sloppy job at what he saw at work. Who is to say?
I'm still excited. Aren't you?
If you aren't... uh, maybe you're in the wrong forum, eh? Using the wrong platform, even?
Okay I'm getting tired of this, it's a fake. It's proven. Let's all go back to Apple MUSIC SERVICE that is scheduled for tomorrow!
Re: Re: Re: Re: photoshop snobs
You can screenshot the images and send them to that site though. More than likely if I was going to do it I'd use both Project Builder and PS. PS just to combine a couple of screenshots so that you couldn't see that I was using Project Builder.
You can screenshot the images and send them to that site though. More than likely if I was going to do it I'd use both Project Builder and PS. PS just to combine a couple of screenshots so that you couldn't see that I was using Project Builder.
Not to say fake or real, but I do have one question about the pile pic-
Why are only 2 of the documents in the pil gryed [selkected]? I don't think the pile would allow each icon in the pile to be individually selected as they are all generic icons. Seems strange to me.
Why are only 2 of the documents in the pil gryed [selkected]? I don't think the pile would allow each icon in the pile to be individually selected as they are all generic icons. Seems strange to me.
Great Adobe trickery. whoever made these gave me a great laugh. to think that he got people to believe that they were legit kills me. I wish I would have thought of it. I know photoshop and screenshots like this! dang.
right, but it's cmd-shift-3 if you have snapz pro X, which comes with most macs, as far as i have seen. it's a really cool program.
eh shadow, it is also Cmd-shift-3 for the whole screen without snapz pro. cmd-shift-4 brings up a cross hair to make a selection capture. I said this in my other post but it seems to be ignored. Anyway, I'm only being pedantic , lol
ah, that's what i thought, actually, but i don't use it. i like the features on Snapz too much. thanks for the correction; there's nothing wrong with a bit of pedantry!Okay, whether or not these screenshots are fake, they, in conjunction with the "rotary dial" mouse got me thinking...
Could another function of this mouse design be to "sort" through a pile on a desktop? You click (or mouseover, whatever) on a pile, the files display themselves in this circular arrangement, and then you "spin" you dial around to get to the file you want.
Makes sense to me...
Could another function of this mouse design be to "sort" through a pile on a desktop? You click (or mouseover, whatever) on a pile, the files display themselves in this circular arrangement, and then you "spin" you dial around to get to the file you want.
Makes sense to me...
Originally posted by Shadowfax
Yeah Snapz is cool, It came with my MDD but I don't really use it much cos I never really need to make screenshots. I suppose I could use the movie feature to show people how to do stuff.
Anyway, this is way off topic, charlie, thats a real good point. Although It would be a bit silly for apple to make everyone buy a new mouse just to be able to use a feature on panther, although it would probably increase the mouse's uptake. I know that as soon as the mouse comes out i'll be buying it.
jayscheuerle
macrumors 68020
One More
Don't forget my favorite- cmd-shift-4+spacebar to bring up a camera that takes a picture of an open window. Hit esc if you don't want it! - j
Don't forget my favorite- cmd-shift-4+spacebar to bring up a camera that takes a picture of an open window. Hit esc if you don't want it! - j
Re: Re: photoshop snobs
Um, but if you took a screen shot and counted pixels you'd see they aren't. "Pile" in the screenshot is kerned differently than "File".
While this may be a bug in 10.3's menu display subsystem which is somehow not evident in the other screenshot menu items, it would be a rather strange bug indeed. Another "bug/missed detail" is the pinstriping on the menu. If there were indeed an item between "New Folder" and "Open" the pinstripe at the bottom of Open (which just overlaps the bottom of the letters) would be just below the bottom of the letters, as you see in "Open With". The pinstriping is not an even divisor of the font size, so you can tell when someone photoshops a menu by just pulling the original menu items down one.
On the other hand, why would someone go through the trouble of photoshopping a menu bar, instead of just using Interface Builder to make a (100% genuine) menu bar with that one extra item thrown in? It's not like the application name is even shown in that menu shot! I mean, if this isn't an odd 10.3 menu display bug, then these guys are pretty bad hacks!
I don't know. I do know that the build number looks way off, and that the menu kerning is a little off, and that the "Piles" graphic is extraordinarily untidy and frankly disgusting (but that last can always happen during the dev cycle ... a feature will often be put in without the full UI pretty-up job having been done).
IMHO: fake. But, as has been said, we'll see in June.
Um, but if you took a screen shot and counted pixels you'd see they aren't. "Pile" in the screenshot is kerned differently than "File".
While this may be a bug in 10.3's menu display subsystem which is somehow not evident in the other screenshot menu items, it would be a rather strange bug indeed. Another "bug/missed detail" is the pinstriping on the menu. If there were indeed an item between "New Folder" and "Open" the pinstripe at the bottom of Open (which just overlaps the bottom of the letters) would be just below the bottom of the letters, as you see in "Open With". The pinstriping is not an even divisor of the font size, so you can tell when someone photoshops a menu by just pulling the original menu items down one.
On the other hand, why would someone go through the trouble of photoshopping a menu bar, instead of just using Interface Builder to make a (100% genuine) menu bar with that one extra item thrown in? It's not like the application name is even shown in that menu shot! I mean, if this isn't an odd 10.3 menu display bug, then these guys are pretty bad hacks!
I don't know. I do know that the build number looks way off, and that the menu kerning is a little off, and that the "Piles" graphic is extraordinarily untidy and frankly disgusting (but that last can always happen during the dev cycle ... a feature will often be put in without the full UI pretty-up job having been done).
IMHO: fake. But, as has been said, we'll see in June.
Re: One More
Aaaaaauuugggghhhhhhhhhh!!!
Crap¡¡¡!!!¡¡¡ I just learned another skill!
THIS SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm going home!
Oh. Wait a minute...
Aaaaaauuugggghhhhhhhhhh!!!
Aaaaaauuugggghhhhhhhhhh!!!
Crap¡¡¡!!!¡¡¡ I just learned another skill!
THIS SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm going home!
Oh. Wait a minute...
Aaaaaauuugggghhhhhhhhhh!!!
Re: Re: Re: photoshop snobs
*I* don't care!
My intuition says I'm right, yer all wrong and this idea of you tryin' to teach me stuff is all bass-ackwards!
Now, leave me alone!
If you don't... well, hah! Maybe I want you to bug me! But we'll never know, will we?!?!?!
:::arrgh::: :ruff, ruff:
*I* don't care!
My intuition says I'm right, yer all wrong and this idea of you tryin' to teach me stuff is all bass-ackwards!
Now, leave me alone!
If you don't... well, hah! Maybe I want you to bug me! But we'll never know, will we?!?!?!
:::arrgh::: :ruff, ruff: