To me their development of a Mastodon client seems only a bitter excuse to stop with further Tweetbot development.
They just posted something to address this directly:
Last edited:
To me their development of a Mastodon client seems only a bitter excuse to stop with further Tweetbot development.
That's been my experience as well. All the people posting hate about it on this thread have, by their own admission, never used it. All "hive mind" this and "anti Elon" that... I haven't seen any of that on Mastodon, at least not amongst the people I follow or my server's feed. Honestly all the anti Elon stuff I only see on Twitter.Mastodon has been really awesome for me -- Super refreshing.
It's been like the Twitter I remember upon joining in the late 2000s
Great people, great interactions, no crypto bots or BS
This reads to me like you construct your world view along arbitrary political lines, making the same thing good or bad depending on whether you perceive whoever does it on your side of the fence or not. You gave me no actual reason what in your view makes Mastodon somehow more resilient in terms of echo chambers than Twitter or even the excellent negative example of usenet that you brought up yourself. All you gave me is a string of words that sounds like some conspiracy theory to me. I don't really care about those at all. I wish I could believe in stuff like that, but usually the world does not turn out to be as simple.It's not hard to understand the difference between algorithms pushing content to you and you choosing what to read yourself.
Echo chambers will always exist in some form or another, it is human nature to find safety in bubbles, but when a software platform and its CEO/board abuse their position to manipulate users then we have a problem on our hands.
The ultra wealthy who lose their minds and brainwash their followers to use them as soldiers should all be treated the same, whether it was Henry Ford and his newspaper/books, Osama in his cave, Murdoch and his "news" network, Putin and his private armies and troll farms, or Trump and MAGA, or Musk and his Muskrat army. If you encourage them they will grow worse and worse and worse.
It is nearly impossible to become ultra wealthy and maintain sanity. 99% of the ultra wealthy will always become extremists.
But I don't think they should be censored. Censoring them will allow them to argue that there is some "plot against freedom" and all other stupid conspiracy theories. We know these these madmen profess to fight for freedom but they are liars.
Instead of censoring, prosecute financial fraud.
Shine a light on their activities every day, including their private networks and financial interests. If stocks are being manipulated with false promises, if markets are being manipulated, if money is being laundered, if bribes are being paid - this is how you prevent the wealthy from abusing society.
In the name of "economic growth" we have seen almost no regulation or prosecution or audits for years. Over half of Musk's promises and manipulations are no different from Elizabeth Holmes and Trevor Milton's fraud.
Th table is still pretty good. The restaurant has just openly invited patrons to defecate on it alongside those trying to enjoy their meals.I don't get why so many people are fleeing Twitter just because it changed ownership. It isn't like the site fell apart and stopped functioning...
Do a little research before commenting.I don't need any
LOL - sure you can big guy. What a myopic world view you must have. At least you can be confident in the fact that you're always right!I can tell from the attitude of proud Mastodon users just what I could expect to find there.
I've been on it for five years. Please tell me more about your vast experience.Mastodon is a mess. Just a bunch unruly ex-Twitter users running their own servers thinking they are God. No way
I can tell from the attitude of proud Mastodon users just what I could expect to find there.
Some people are threatened by allowing free discussion on Twitter.
Nobody is threatened by free discussion, that's mostly a straw man
People don't want unfettered nastiness, misogyny, racism and harassment directed at them, at scale
If Elon gets 100% of what he wants, it will basically just become a "white bro" site, which will be as appealing to advertisers and mainstream users as Truth Social, Parler and other existing niche sites
When I first got on Mastodon I thought it was a mess because I thought it was dumb to have to pick a server, all my friends were on different servers and what if I wanted to see them all. Then I got on, got a 3rd party app (I used Metatext) and realized that I could still follow friends on other servers. It's still not a Twitter replacement... it's not simple enough to replace Twitter, if something were to actually replace Twitter it would really have to be a single platform like Twitter or Facebook or something (but not Twitter or Facebook obviously.) But Mastodon itself should not be discounted just because it isn't a clone of Twitter. My friends that I made on Twitter and that migrated to Mastodon are usually more tech focused people, so they migrated over just fine and it really does feel like the "early days of Twitter" but mainly because for ME at least, the "early days of twitter" was a bunch of geeks geeking out over a new platform.One other thought (before I get sidetracked again)
Many years ago, the twitter app sucked - both on iOS and MacOS. Tapbots' Tweetbot and Twitteriffic did a great job of making the entire platform more usable. We may be seeing the same thing with Tapbots and Mastodon.
At least I hope so!
What’s Mastodon?
Agree - I'm enjoying it like the early days of twitter too! I would like a nicer app - especially for my Mac!When I first got on Mastodon I thought it was a mess because I thought it was dumb to have to pick a server, all my friends were on different servers and what if I wanted to see them all. Then I got on, got a 3rd party app (I used Metatext) and realized that I could still follow friends on other servers. It's still not a Twitter replacement... it's not simple enough to replace Twitter, if something were to actually replace Twitter it would really have to be a single platform like Twitter or Facebook or something (but not Twitter or Facebook obviously.) But Mastodon itself should not be discounted just because it isn't a clone of Twitter. My friends that I made on Twitter and that migrated to Mastodon are usually more tech focused people, so they migrated over just fine and it really does feel like the "early days of Twitter" but mainly because for ME at least, the "early days of twitter" was a bunch of geeks geeking out over a new platform.
You join a server but you can see and communicate with whomever you want to. I only follow 3 people from the server I'm on, all the rest are on different servers. Once you join a server and get a decent app, it works and looks pretty much just like Twitter.it's sort of an open source twitter that runs on public servers. you have to pick the "instance" or server to join and you only see and communicate with people on that server so its all disjointed and not unified. You also run the risk that when whoever runs the instance gets bored your entire Mastodon world just disappears. It is also buggy as hell.
Yeah but if there is only a handful of major hosts then how is this any improvement?People that are mad about this for ideological reasons are vastly overstating the challenges of using the Fediverse. Self-hosting will always require some effort, but nobody is forcing you to self host anyways... Unless the kind of content you're posting is extreme.
I did, it's called "the news". And in those news the SJWs and leftists got their panties in a twist and fled (partially) to places like Mastadon.Do a little research before commenting.
You are 100 percent correct. Though if you posted that on Mastodon, they would've all reported you and had you silenced immediately for the sin of "wrong think"I did, it's called "the news". And in those news the SJWs and leftists got their panties in a twist and fled (partially) to places like Mastadon.
Exactly what is incorrect about this?
I do to the extent that I'd like to see decentralized alternatives to proprietary silo-platforms grow, and Mastodon is serving its purpose as an on-ramp to the fediverse (which, ideally, at least some of these newbies will eventually realize is not an invention of Mastodon and calling it the "Mastodon network" is like calling roads "the Toyota network").MacRumors, I can promise with full confidence and I believe I speak for all of my fellow forum users here that absolutely none of us care about Mastodon.