Companies, including Apple, probably do the trickle release from time to time when they feel they are that ahead of the competition—but not in the case of this thread. I don’t think some people here are understanding the fact that for those who don’t see the difference, which is likely the vast majority out there, increased resolution beyond 326 PPI is both superfluous and detrimental (cost and battery life). So it’s not something they should ever want on future iterations of their iPhone.
Maybe a minority can see the difference, probably most of them having to really look for it and compare side by side. But I think mostly it’s just people having a complex of wanting to say/know they have the highest specs in the industry, regardless of whether or not it’s actually a good thing to have.
If it’s just complaining about cost, and wanting more for the money, as someone who doesn’t notice the resolution difference, I’d much rather Apple give me something that will actually benefit me, like better cameras or more storage.
True. The Apple ecosystem has such weak competition. No other company has an ecosystem 1) so filled out and well-executed, and 2) focused on privacy. Microsoft probably has the best position to do this in regard to their resources and business model (not ad-based), but they gave up on phones which is basically the biggest piece of the puzzle. Also their obligation to support a million OEMs doesn’t help.
What baffles me is that here we are in 2020 and Apple have been delighting customers and printing money for over 15 years and not a single company has tried to emulate their business model.
Are Apple really truly unique with no other company able to be like them?