Hum… for all we know, they might be interested in under display fingerprint sensors for, say, the Touch Bar or something else. FACE ID it great on the iPhone!
No way. I’d never got back to a Touch ID only phone. Anyway I presume this would be for low end models that would otherwise use Touch ID. That way Apple can create a smaller phone with a larger screen.Good. FaceID is one of the biggest steps backwards in terms of UX that's Apple's ever made.
Yes lick your screen to unlock.We should just get ahead of the curve and jump right into DNA. SalivaID is where it's at!
I definitely prefer touch ID over Face ID.
Problem with underscreen touch id is there isnt a phisical button so lock button will still doing all this functions...My issue with Face ID has nothing to do with accuracy or ease of use. It's pretty accurate and easy to use, but I don't think it's as easy as Touch ID nor is it as intuitive. I just find the way the Touch ID workflows go to be easier to understand. Like, I'm never going to accidentally turn my phone off because I tried to double tap the SLEEP button to CONFIRM that I want to pay with Apple Pay and then get nervous because in my moment of confusion, I pressed the SLEEP button four times already in a short period of time and pressing it a fifth time will trigger an emergency call countdown.
I really hope this is not in replacement of Face ID.
Nobody uses Animoji outside USA , as nobody uses iMesseges outside USA
Face ID works on my Bike. Face ID works when i'm sweaty. Face ID works at my Desk. Face ID works when i'm lying down in bed. FACE ID WORKS
Touch ID was awful and never worked for me. The amount of people that hate Face ID here is staggering. I don't get it. What are you doing wrong?
That would be a dream, a full screen iphone without notch!! And fingerprint instant access to the home screen??? ( no more extra steps) now make it 16:9 so we can use it with one hand
the return of the iphone
I prefer Face ID. Maybe I’m dull, but I don’t see the advantage to going back for fingerprints?
Some people don't like being on the wrong side of a camera. Personally, I just type in a six character code with both Latin and non Latin letters.I prefer Face ID. Maybe I’m dull, but I don’t see the advantage to going back for fingerprints?
They never said it was more accurate. They said it was more secure.clearly fake news, because apple told us that faceid is much more accurate than a fingerprint scanner.
what's next? they're gonna reintroduce the headphone jack? now that would be brave of them.
Iphone 8 and 8 plus have face id without the Notch. Got it! Where are you people from?Having both options, as an either/or, or a combined 2-factor for higher security scenarios, isn't the worst idea.
I wouldn't mind having both active, and it being a race-to-authenticate, so that whichever one happens first, unlocks the phone.
It would decrease the security (since fingerprint auth is 50,000 times less secure than Face ID), but I would have no problem with it. The end result user experience would be Touch ID succeeding when Face ID fails, and Face ID succeeding when Touch ID fails.
This might also allow us to get rid of the utterly stupid 'double click side button' to make a purchase. If/when you have both enabled, you 2-factor for a purchase and thats it.
Potential here with both. Lots of potential.
[automerge]1575404378[/automerge]
Because the notch exists solely because of Face ID and couldn't possible have anything to with...you know...the camera? Last I checked the camera was there before and would still be there regardless.
Where do you people come from?
More accurate is less secure if more accurate means less false negatives. More false negatives is less false positives.They never said it was more accurate. They said it was more secure.
lol that guy is just complaining to complain. I have a wireless charging stand to the right of my computer. All I have to do is tap my screen and it unlocks instantly LOLSo buy a $10 desk stand for your phone. I did.