I watch a LOT of anime, and I've never seen any mention of this Pepe the frog...
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Elon Musk Claims Apple Has 'Mostly Stopped' Offering Ads on Twitter and Is Making Moderation Demands
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I certainly understand why you want to discredit the ADL out of hand.
The ADL acknowledges that Pepe is used in a variety of non-hate-based contexts in the same ADL article that you link to. What's your point?
It’s always a red flag for me when people say these ridiculous things about the ADL. Yea, they definitely don’t have an agenda or anything.
It acknowledges it, but still classes it broadly as a hate symbol. What’s your point?
Anytime you make an Apple App and submit it for review, and it contains even a single pepe, it gets rejected and apple points to this.
So, that’s kinda like saying “Hey we get that MacBooks weren’t created by the for hate, but some people use it for that, so we will outright ban it. “
Nope. Only when it is used in racist or anti-Semitic contexts. Again, just read the article that you linked to.
"However, because so many Pepe the Frog memes are not bigoted in nature, it is important to examine use of the meme only in context. The mere fact of posting a Pepe meme does not mean that someone is racist or white supremacist. However, if the meme itself is racist or anti-Semitic in nature, or if it appears in a context containing bigoted or offensive language or symbols, then it may have been used for hateful purposes."
Which has nothing to do with what we were talking about. You're just moving the goalposts.
So it’s not pepe, but the Nazi/other hate symbols included In the meme?
Can’t any meme do that?
Attachments
Again, it's spelled out in the article that you posted. Sure, any meme could be used in hate-based context. But Pepe is used as a hate symbol. The fact that it is primarily used in other contexts doesn't change that fact. And it certainly doesn't discredit the ADL.
You did not get a single thing right. Weird how you choose to ignore the legislation sponsored - and explained - by State Senator Scott Weiner.What you mention regarding California law is not accurate, or true. See link below.
My issue with the term "grooming" is now it is being applied to any situation deemed to fit a certain agenda. For example, a drag show is considered grooming, a teacher being gay is considered grooming, displaying a rainbow flag is considered grooming. It's hate speech disguised as a legitimate gripe. It really all started with the Qanon junk that has now permeated its way to the top of a major political party in America. In their eyes, gay people don't deserve rights. It's disgusting and anti-American. People can believe in Christianity and their "sanctity of marriage", etc. without shoving their beliefs into our government, where we are supposed to have a separation of church and state.
Prior to 2020, California law permitted judges to decide if a man should be registered as a sex offender if they had voluntary vaginal intercourse with a 14–17-year-old girl, but only if he was no more than 10 years older than her.
California Statutory Rape Laws - Penal Code 261.5 PC | Aron Law Firm
Statutory Rape is defined under California Penal Code 261.5 PC which defines statutory rape as unlawful sex with a minor under the age of 18.www.aronlawfirm.com
And then you just repeated the propaganda that is patently untrue. All you did was prove my point.
Are white people discriminated against on systemic levels?
Musk got booed at the Chappelle show at Chase Center last night. He has been deleting the video from Twitter and banning those posting it, what happened to to all the free speech?
A source from a site he does not own:
A source from a site he does not own:
Still avoiding the hypocrisy. He gets resoundingly booed at Dave Chapelle's show. Someone posts the video of him being booed on Twitter. Musk deletes the tweet. And you want to grandstand about "free speech."
My statement stands.
BL.
He deleted his own tweet. Is that against free speech?Still avoiding the hypocrisy. He gets resoundingly booed at Dave Chapelle's show. Someone posts the video of him being booed on Twitter. Musk deletes the tweet. And you want to grandstand about "free speech."
My statement stands.
BL.
It was in the original post that you replied to.
Video of Elon Musk getting booed on stage at Dave Chappelle's show last night was removed from Twitter (here's a copy) | Boing Boing
Dave Chappelle had a treat for attendees at his comedy show in San Francisco last night. He brought attention-starved hectobillionaire Elon Musk on stage. Cameras weren’t allowed at the show,…
No, no. Where in the article does it claim Elon/Twitter deleted a video?It was in the original post that you replied to.
Video of Elon Musk getting booed on stage at Dave Chappelle's show last night was removed from Twitter (here's a copy) | Boing Boing
Dave Chappelle had a treat for attendees at his comedy show in San Francisco last night. He brought attention-starved hectobillionaire Elon Musk on stage. Cameras weren’t allowed at the show,…boingboing.net
The article literally only said: “Curiously, Cleo PatrA's account was deleted.”
Please delete your incorrect claim, for it’s a lie you made up.
And when you do just a LITTLE research (hard for party line towers) you’ll see this:
I didn't say he did. That was another poster. I simply pointed out that the tweet in question was not Elon's tweet.
