This not about it not "being perfect". It is no where close to that bar. My post was discussing how people are comparing the goggles to the iPhone's first generation device. The iPhone, like the other devices I mentioned, nailed the form factor for mass adoption. This thing, on the other hand, is far from nailing that design. In other words, stop comparing it to the iPhone (iPad, Watch) release. It isn't in the same ballpark.
The original iPhone didn't nail the form factor. At the time people criticized it as being too wide to comfortably fit into one's hands since it was ½-inch wider than a standard cell phone.
Within a couple of years, the industry trended towards larger phones -- phablets. Criticism of the iPhone changed from "too small" to "not large enough". Apple resisted the trend for 7 years until the iPhone 6 Plus in 2014. Now, most iPhones fall into the category of what was called a phablet a decade ago.
Besides the size, other design criticisms were:
• Too slippery, too easy to drop.
• No hardware keyboard. The on-screen keyboard was too small for normal sized fingers. There was no tactile feedback from it. As designed, it was considered useless for real work.
• The battery was not removable. You will be tethered to a charger if you want to use it for any length of time.
It seems the Vision Pro is getting much of the same criticism. Perhaps you don't see it as being in the same ballpark because the extremity of your criticisms are out in left field.
Also, I disagree on your point that criticizing a first gen device is "inane". The product is no where close to being perfect and it costs $3500. If you have an issue with that, spend more time watching certain YouTube creators (stay away from the Verge) and less on a discussion forum.
I didn't say criticizing a first-get device is inane. I said "Criticizing the device
for not being perfect on first release is inane." I stand by that comment.